Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Mauritius's ratings to Baa2, maintains negative outlookGlobal Credit Research - 04 Mar 2021New York, March 04, 2021 -- Moody's Investors Service, ("Moody's") has today downgraded the Government of Mauritius's long-term foreign and local currency issuer rating to Baa2 from Baa1 and maintained the negative outlook.The downgrade to Baa2 reflects the weakening in fiscal and economic strength as a result of the shock brought on by the coronavirus pandemic.The large share of economic activity, export earnings and employment derived from tourism and related sectors will weigh on the pace of the economic recovery. This in turn will slow the pace of fiscal consolidation. Combined with large fiscal support, this points to a sharp and long-lasting deterioration in fiscal and debt metrics, resulting in a weaker fiscal profile than Baa1-peers, and reducing the government's shock absorption capacity.Mauritius's credit profile continues to be supported by a strong institutional framework, which has supported historically high and stable growth rates. Past economic growth has supported an increase in income per capita, signaling a higher capacity to absorb shocks.The negative outlook reflects the mutually reinforcing downside risks from a slower recovery in the tourism sector than Moody's currently expects, with spillovers to the rest of the economy, which would exacerbate the weakening of fiscal strength. The negative outlook also captures the risks related to some of the pandemic-related policy measures, and in particular the large financing of the 2021 budget by the central bank, which raises risks to monetary policy effectiveness.Mauritius's country ceilings have been lowered by one notch. Namely, Mauritius's local-currency country ceiling was lowered to A1 from Aa3. The four-notch gap to the sovereign rating reflects a relatively favorable legal and regulatory framework that supports policy predictability, low external vulnerabilities and a stable political system, balanced by reliance on tourism which represents a source of common shock for the government and non-government issuers in the country. The foreign-currency ceiling was lowered to A1 from Aa3. Mauritius's role as an international financial center significantly reduces the incentives to impose transfer and convertibility restrictions, supporting the foreign-currency ceiling's alignment with the local-currency ceiling.RATINGS RATIONALERATIONALE FOR DOWNGRADE TO Baa2EROSION OF ECONOMIC AND FISCAL STRENGTH AS A RESULT OF THE CORONAVIRUS SHOCKMauritius faces more severe long-term economic scarring than Moody's anticipated a year ago, which will reduce both economic and fiscal strength.Real GDP contracted by 15% in 2020, with the tourism sector being hardest hit. Mauritius faces prospects for a slower economic recovery, with the tourism industry likely to suffer durable effects from the shock brought on by the coronavirus pandemic.The economic recovery is highly dependent on a rebound in tourism activity. Tourism's direct contribution to GDP is estimated at 8.2% of GDP in 2019 and, when including the indirect contribution from other industries such as transport and accommodation and food service, 23% of GDP.The government expects international tourism flows to resume in the second half of 2021. While Moody's also assumes that activity in the tourism sector will grow during this year, a return to pre-pandemic tourist arrivals is likely several years away. Under Moody's baseline scenario for economic growth of 6.5% and 5% in 2021 and 2022, respectively, taking into account a recovery in non-tourism sectors that has started since the easing of lockdown measures in the second half of 2020, Mauritius's economy will remain 5% smaller than 2019 levels in 2022. Per capita income (measured in local currency) will only return to 2019 levels at the end of 2022.The severity of the contraction and the government's fiscal policy response contribute to a significant rise in government debt and weakening in Mauritius's fiscal strength. The government's fiscal policy response to the coronavirus shock has been one of the largest among Moody's-rated sovereigns. The government has expanded social protection schemes aimed at supporting household income and minimizing job losses, while also providing support to large corporations and other businesses affected by the coronavirus shock.While the government is committed to maintain moderate deficits over the medium term, the pace of fiscal consolidation will largely depend on the speed of the economic recovery, with material proactive fiscal consolidation unlikely in the near term.Overall, Mauritius's debt burden was already higher than comparable Baa-rated sovereign peers and will rise further as a result of the pandemic. Central government debt increased to 73.4% of GDP at the end of fiscal year 2020 (ending 30 June 2020), above the Baa-rated median of 63.8%. Moody's expects government debt to peak at just over 80% of GDP in 2021, before gradually declining. An unconditional grant from the central bank, worth 12% of GDP, prevented an even larger increase in government debt.Mauritius's credit profile continues to benefit from a stable political and macroeconomic environment conducive to growth and attracting foreign investment. Prior to the coronavirus shock, the Mauritian economy demonstrated very steady growth rates, averaging 3.7% between 2010 and 2019. The recently established free trade agreement with China and the signing of a Comprehensive Economic Cooperation and Partnership with India will likely boost trade and investment with both countries over the next several years.The country's business-friendly investment environment has attracted foreign investment, mainly in the financial sector, which has contributed to accumulation of international reserves. The accumulation of a large stock of international reserves provides a significant buffer to external shocks.RATIONALE FOR THE NEGATIVE OUTLOOKThe negative outlook reflects the mutually reinforcing downside risks from a slower recovery in the tourism sector than Moody's currently expects, with spillovers to the rest of the economy, which would exacerbate the erosion in fiscal strength.In the near term, risks to a recovery in tourism will depend on the ongoing rollout of vaccination programs and lingering consumer concerns about the safety of travel. Over the longer term, changes in consumer behavior could reduce demand for long-haul travel, affecting demand for tourism in Mauritius.The government's plans for fiscal consolidation rest on the re-opening of the tourism sector. A delayed resumption of tourism activity, or a slower recovery over the long term as mentioned above, would prevent a faster reduction in government spending, while also weighing on revenue collection.The negative outlook also captures the risks related to some of the pandemic-related policy measures, and in particular the large financing of the 2021 budget by the central bank, which raises risks to monetary policy effectiveness. There is a risk that the large expansion of the monetary base increases inflationary pressures that prove hard to contain, leading to a rise in domestic borrowing costs including for the government.ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE CONSIDERATIONSMauritius's ESG Credit Impact Score is neutral to low (CIS-2) reflecting its moderately negative exposure to environmental risks, neutral to low social risk, and the positive influence of governance. A high debt burden will constrain the sovereign's resiliency, and may limit its ability to maintain a large social safety net, with a potential increase in social risk.Mauritius's credit profile is moderately negatively exposed to environmental risks (E-3 issuer profile score) reflecting natural capital risks, given the country's reliance on natural capital as a basis of economic activity and significant risks posed by climate events on economy and government finances. In particular, Mauritius is exposed to weather-related events due to its small size and the importance of tourism in the economy.Exposure to social risks is neutral to low (S-2 issuer profile score), and it captures broad access to basic services, high levels of secondary school enrollment, and low levels of inequality. Demographic trends pose a moderate negative risk. The country has almost nonexistent poverty rates and a relatively even distribution of income, while the government offers universal free access to education and primary healthcare, all of which reduce the risk of social unrest. Over time, an aging population, combined with negative net migration and low fertility rates, could increase government spending pressures.The influence of governance on Mauritius's credit profile is positive (G-1 issuer profile score) and captures the overall strength of Mauritius's institutions. The government has demonstrated a strong track record of economic management with a technically competent public administration and good policy coordination. As mentioned, there are risks to the effectiveness of monetary policy from the nature and size of the policy actions taken in response to the pandemic.FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGSGiven the negative outlook, an upgrade is unlikely in the near future. The implementation and execution on a fiscal consolidation that arrests the upward debt trajectory would likely result in a return to a stable outlook. A return to the stable outlook would also likely entail increasing confidence that the central bank's monetary policy effectiveness is not negatively affected and in particular, that medium-term inflationary risks remain contained.A continued deterioration in debt metrics, beyond Moody's current expectations, would likely lead to a downgrade. This may be consistent with weaker fiscal policy effectiveness. Furthermore, weakening monetary policy effectiveness as demonstrated by rising inflationary risks would also likely result in a downgrade. An increase in domestic or external imbalances, as reflected in an increase in price and exchange rate volatility, accompanied by a deterioration in the country's balance of payments position, could also lead to a downgrade.GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 23,819 (2019 Actual) (also known as Per Capita Income)Real GDP growth (% change): 3% (2019 Actual) (also known as GDP Growth)Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec/Dec): 0.9% (2019 Actual)Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: -3.2% (2019 Actual) (also known as Fiscal Balance)Current Account Balance/GDP: -5.4% (2019 Actual) (also known as External Balance)External debt/GDP: 15.8 (2019 Actual)Economic resiliency: baa1Default history: No default events (on bonds or loans) have been recorded since 1983.On 01 March 2021, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the Mauritius, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's economic fundamentals, including its economic strength, have materially decreased. The issuer's fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, has materially decreased. Other views raised included: The issuer's institutions and governance strength, have materially decreased. The issuer's susceptibility to event risks has not materially changed.The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Ratings Methodology published in November 2019 and available at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1158631. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this credit rating action, if applicable.REGULATORY DISCLOSURESFor further specification of Moody's key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure form. Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found at: https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_79004.For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.These ratings are solicited. Please refer to Moody's Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings available on its website www.moodys.com.Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.Moody's general principles for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in our credit analysis can be found at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1243406.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU and is endorsed by Moody's Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt am Main 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the UK and is endorsed by Moody's Investors Service Limited, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5FA under the law applicable to credit rating agencies in the UK. Further information on the UK endorsement status and on the Moody's office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. David Rogovic Vice President - Senior Analyst Sovereign Risk Group Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 Marie Diron MD - Sovereign Risk Sovereign Risk Group JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 Client Service: 44 20 7772 5454 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 © 2021 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.