U.S. markets closed
  • S&P Futures

    3,605.50
    +4.00 (+0.11%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    28,872.00
    +71.00 (+0.25%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    11,018.50
    -17.00 (-0.15%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    1,675.90
    +6.10 (+0.37%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.93
    +2.44 (+3.07%)
     
  • Gold

    1,677.70
    +5.70 (+0.34%)
     
  • Silver

    19.24
    +0.20 (+1.03%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    0.9827
    +0.0026 (+0.27%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    3.8040
    +0.0570 (+1.52%)
     
  • Vix

    31.62
    -0.22 (-0.69%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.1154
    -0.0012 (-0.10%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    144.7470
    +0.0180 (+0.01%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    19,230.72
    -73.59 (-0.38%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    437.27
    -6.16 (-1.39%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    6,893.81
    +12.22 (+0.18%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    25,998.60
    +61.39 (+0.24%)
     

How Much Of NightDragon Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:NDAC) Do Institutions Own?

·4 min read

Every investor in NightDragon Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:NDAC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

NightDragon Acquisition is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of US$434m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about NightDragon Acquisition.

Check out our latest analysis for NightDragon Acquisition

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NightDragon Acquisition?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

We can see that NightDragon Acquisition does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see NightDragon Acquisition's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in NightDragon Acquisition. NightDragon Acquisition Sponsor, LLC is currently the largest shareholder, with 22% of shares outstanding. With 4.5% and 4.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Millennium Management LLC and Citadel Advisors LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

Insider Ownership Of NightDragon Acquisition

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 22%, of the NightDragon Acquisition stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand NightDragon Acquisition better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that NightDragon Acquisition is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those shouldn't be ignored...

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here