What You Must Know About Smiths Group plc’s (LON:SMIN) ROE

In this article:

Smiths Group plc (LSE:SMIN) outperformed the Industrial Conglomerates industry on the basis of its ROE – producing a higher 18.97% relative to the peer average of 12.32% over the past 12 months. On the surface, this looks fantastic since we know that SMIN has made large profits from little equity capital; however, ROE doesn’t tell us if management have borrowed heavily to make this happen. We’ll take a closer look today at factors like financial leverage to determine whether SMIN’s ROE is actually sustainable. Check out our latest analysis for Smiths Group

Peeling the layers of ROE – trisecting a company’s profitability

Return on Equity (ROE) weighs Smiths Group’s profit against the level of its shareholders’ equity. It essentially shows how much the company can generate in earnings given the amount of equity it has raised. Generally speaking, a higher ROE is preferred; however, there are other factors we must also consider before making any conclusions.

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity

Returns are usually compared to costs to measure the efficiency of capital. Smiths Group’s cost of equity is 8.74%. Since Smiths Group’s return covers its cost in excess of 10.24%, its use of equity capital is efficient and likely to be sustainable. Simply put, Smiths Group pays less for its capital than what it generates in return. ROE can be dissected into three distinct ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:

Dupont Formula

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)

ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity

LSE:SMIN Last Perf May 14th 18
LSE:SMIN Last Perf May 14th 18

The first component is profit margin, which measures how much of sales is retained after the company pays for all its expenses. Asset turnover reveals how much revenue can be generated from Smiths Group’s asset base. And finally, financial leverage is simply how much of assets are funded by equity, which exhibits how sustainable the company’s capital structure is. Since financial leverage can artificially inflate ROE, we need to look at how much debt Smiths Group currently has. Currently the debt-to-equity ratio stands at a reasonable 78.94%, which means its above-average ROE is driven by its ability to grow its profit without a significant debt burden.

LSE:SMIN Historical Debt May 14th 18
LSE:SMIN Historical Debt May 14th 18

Next Steps:

ROE is one of many ratios which meaningfully dissects financial statements, which illustrates the quality of a company. Smiths Group’s above-industry ROE is encouraging, and is also in excess of its cost of equity. Its high ROE is not likely to be driven by high debt. Therefore, investors may have more confidence in the sustainability of this level of returns going forward. ROE is a helpful signal, but it is definitely not sufficient on its own to make an investment decision.

For Smiths Group, there are three relevant aspects you should look at:

  1. Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.

  2. Valuation: What is Smiths Group worth today? Is the stock undervalued, even when its growth outlook is factored into its intrinsic value? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether Smiths Group is currently mispriced by the market.

  3. Other High-Growth Alternatives : Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of Smiths Group? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.

Advertisement