U.S. Markets closed
  • S&P 500

    4,145.19
    -6.75 (-0.16%)
     
  • Dow 30

    32,803.47
    +76.67 (+0.23%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    12,657.55
    -63.04 (-0.50%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    1,921.82
    +15.36 (+0.81%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    88.53
    -0.01 (-0.01%)
     
  • Gold

    1,772.60
    -15.90 (-0.89%)
     
  • Silver

    19.86
    -0.26 (-1.30%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0187
    -0.0063 (-0.6112%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    2.8400
    +0.1640 (+6.13%)
     
  • Vix

    21.15
    -0.29 (-1.35%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2071
    -0.0088 (-0.7206%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    134.9700
    +1.9540 (+1.4690%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    23,113.22
    -107.21 (-0.46%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    533.20
    -2.02 (-0.38%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,439.74
    -8.32 (-0.11%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    28,175.87
    +243.67 (+0.87%)
     

What Is The Ownership Structure Like For Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO)?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Every investor in Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. Companies that used to be publicly owned tend to have lower insider ownership.

Phillips Edison has a market capitalization of US$4.5b, so it's too big to fly under the radar. We'd expect to see both institutions and retail investors owning a portion of the company. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Phillips Edison.

See our latest analysis for Phillips Edison

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Phillips Edison?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Phillips Edison. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Phillips Edison, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Phillips Edison. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.2% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.8% and 6.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Phillips Edison

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. in their own names. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$19m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 39% stake in Phillips Edison. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Phillips Edison (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.