U.S. markets closed
  • S&P 500

    4,455.48
    +6.50 (+0.15%)
     
  • Dow 30

    34,798.00
    +33.18 (+0.10%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,047.70
    -4.54 (-0.03%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    2,248.07
    -10.97 (-0.49%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    73.95
    +0.65 (+0.89%)
     
  • Gold

    1,750.60
    +0.80 (+0.05%)
     
  • Silver

    22.37
    -0.27 (-1.20%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.1718
    -0.0029 (-0.25%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.4600
    +0.0500 (+3.55%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3681
    -0.0040 (-0.29%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    110.6850
    +0.3840 (+0.35%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    41,862.54
    -3,145.46 (-6.99%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,067.20
    -35.86 (-3.25%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,051.48
    -26.87 (-0.38%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    30,248.81
    +609.41 (+2.06%)
     

Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk. When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (NASDAQ:PANL) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Pangaea Logistics Solutions

What Is Pangaea Logistics Solutions's Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Pangaea Logistics Solutions had debt of US$118.5m at the end of June 2019, a reduction from US$167.7m over a year. On the flip side, it has US$41.2m in cash leading to net debt of about US$77.4m.

NasdaqCM:PANL Historical Debt, November 5th 2019
NasdaqCM:PANL Historical Debt, November 5th 2019

A Look At Pangaea Logistics Solutions's Liabilities

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Pangaea Logistics Solutions had liabilities of US$64.6m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$156.9m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$41.2m as well as receivables valued at US$22.6m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$157.7m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's US$146.7m market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net debt is sitting at a very reasonable 1.6 times its EBITDA, while its EBIT covered its interest expense just 3.4 times last year. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. Unfortunately, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's EBIT flopped 11% over the last four quarters. If earnings continue to decline at that rate then handling the debt will be more difficult than taking three children under 5 to a fancy pants restaurant. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Pangaea Logistics Solutions's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, Pangaea Logistics Solutions saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

Our View

We'd go so far as to say Pangaea Logistics Solutions's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was disappointing. But on the bright side, its net debt to EBITDA is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. We're quite clear that we consider Pangaea Logistics Solutions to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. Given the risks around Pangaea Logistics Solutions's use of debt, the sensible thing to do is to check if insiders have been unloading the stock.

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.