U.S. markets closed
  • S&P 500

    4,228.48
    -55.26 (-1.29%)
     
  • Dow 30

    33,706.74
    -292.30 (-0.86%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    12,705.21
    -260.13 (-2.01%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    1,957.35
    -43.38 (-2.17%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    89.91
    -0.59 (-0.65%)
     
  • Gold

    1,760.30
    -10.90 (-0.62%)
     
  • Silver

    18.97
    -0.50 (-2.56%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0039
    -0.0053 (-0.52%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    2.9890
    +0.1090 (+3.78%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.1823
    -0.0109 (-0.92%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    136.9300
    +1.0680 (+0.79%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    21,213.83
    -800.25 (-3.64%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    504.88
    -36.72 (-6.78%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,550.37
    +8.52 (+0.11%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    28,930.33
    -11.81 (-0.04%)
     

What Percentage Of Sprinklr, Inc. (NYSE:CXM) Shares Do Insiders Own?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

The big shareholder groups in Sprinklr, Inc. (NYSE:CXM) have power over the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

Sprinklr is a pretty big company. It has a market capitalization of US$4.8b. Normally institutions would own a significant portion of a company this size. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Sprinklr.

See our latest analysis for Sprinklr

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sprinklr?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

We can see that Sprinklr does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sprinklr, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Sprinklr is not owned by hedge funds. Hellman & Friedman LLC is currently the largest shareholder, with 22% of shares outstanding. With 21% and 18% of the shares outstanding respectively, Ragy Thomas and Battery Ventures are the second and third largest shareholders. Ragy Thomas, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Sprinklr

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Sprinklr, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$4.8b, and insiders have US$1.2b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 15% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over Sprinklr. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 40% stake in Sprinklr. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Sprinklr (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.