This article is intended for those of you who are at the beginning of your investing journey and want to learn about Return on Equity using a real-life example.
PJSC LUKOIL (MCX:LKOH) outperformed the Integrated Oil and Gas industry on the basis of its ROE – producing a higher 13.0% relative to the peer average of 12.0% over the past 12 months. On the surface, this looks fantastic since we know that LKOH has made large profits from little equity capital; however, ROE doesn’t tell us if management have borrowed heavily to make this happen. Today, we’ll take a closer look at some factors like financial leverage to see how sustainable LKOH’s ROE is.
What you must know about ROE
Return on Equity (ROE) is a measure of PJSC LUKOIL’s profit relative to its shareholders’ equity. An ROE of 13.0% implies RUB0.13 returned on every RUB1 invested. While a higher ROE is preferred in most cases, there are several other factors we should consider before drawing any conclusions.
Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity
ROE is assessed against cost of equity, which is measured using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) – but let’s not dive into the details of that today. For now, let’s just look at the cost of equity number for PJSC LUKOIL, which is 13.4%. Since PJSC LUKOIL’s return does not cover its cost, with a difference of -0.4%, this means its current use of equity is not efficient and not sustainable. Very simply, PJSC LUKOIL pays more for its capital than what it generates in return. ROE can be dissected into three distinct ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:
ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage
ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)
ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity
Essentially, profit margin shows how much money the company makes after paying for all its expenses. Asset turnover shows how much revenue PJSC LUKOIL can generate with its current asset base. Finally, financial leverage will be our main focus today. It shows how much of assets are funded by equity and can show how sustainable the company’s capital structure is. Since financial leverage can artificially inflate ROE, we need to look at how much debt PJSC LUKOIL currently has. At 16.9%, PJSC LUKOIL’s debt-to-equity ratio appears low and indicates the above-average ROE is generated from its capacity to increase profit without a large debt burden.
ROE is a simple yet informative ratio, illustrating the various components that each measure the quality of the overall stock. PJSC LUKOIL exhibits a strong ROE against its peers, however it was not high enough to cover its own cost of equity this year. ROE is not likely to be inflated by excessive debt funding, giving shareholders more conviction in the sustainability of industry-beating returns. ROE is a helpful signal, but it is definitely not sufficient on its own to make an investment decision.
For PJSC LUKOIL, there are three essential aspects you should further examine:
- Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.
- Valuation: What is PJSC LUKOIL worth today? Is the stock undervalued, even when its growth outlook is factored into its intrinsic value? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether PJSC LUKOIL is currently mispriced by the market.
- Other High-Growth Alternatives : Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of PJSC LUKOIL? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!
To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.
The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at email@example.com.