U.S. Markets close in 2 hrs 36 mins

Republicans Can't Kill Obamacare, So They're Turning It Into Trumpcare

Republicanshaven’t figured out how to kill theAffordable Care Act. But they are transforming it into a weaker, less efficient and more dysfunctional version of itself.

They’ve been at it since thevery first daysofDonald Trump’s presidency, when officials in hisadministrationcanceled advertising for the final week of open enrollment for coverage at healthcare.gov. At the time, they justified it as a cost-cutting move, although the dollars were a pittance andinternal research, which later became public, showed that earlier advertising had boosted enrollment.

Now GOP lawmakers are on the verge of taking a more visible and potentially more consequential step. The tax cut bill Senate Republicans passed earlier this month would eliminatetheindividual mandate, a key piece of the program’s architecture that requires people to get insurance or pay a penalty to the government. If final legislation includes the same provision, and if the legislation becomes law, then fewer people will have insurance and premiums will be higher, according to experts in and outside the government.

The cumulative effect of Republican changes to Obamacare won’t be tantamount to repeal. That’s largely because of the Affordable Care Act’s other core elements: tax credits for people buying insurance on their own, regulations on who and what insurers must cover, and special federal funding for expanded state Medicaid programs. As long as those rules are in force and as long as that money keeps flowing, the insurance system that PresidentBarack Obamaand theDemocratscreated in 2010 will continue to put decent, affordable coverage within the reach of millions.

But the health care landscape already looks a lot different than it did when Obama left office. In many states, old problems with insurance markets have become worse, while new problems have appeared. Rules for Medicaid are changing in ways that make it harder to get on and then stay on the program. The number of people without insurance has started tocreepup, and, following this year’s open enrollment period, which ends Friday, it’s likely to rise more significantly.

If the transformation continues, it could work out just fine for some Americans. In some cases, it might even seem like an improvement. But for the country as a whole, it would almost surely mean worse access to care and more financial hardship from medical bills. After three years of progress, the country would be backsliding.

How Private Insurance Is Changing

The most well-publicized changes of the last year have affected private insurance for people who buy coverage on their own rather than through employers.

The Affordable Care Act reorganized this troubled part of the insurance market by requiring carriers to cover people with pre-existing medical conditions ― and then setting standards for coverage of 10 “essential” benefits, including mental health, maternity care and prescriptions. To make sure plans are affordable, the law introduced tax credits for anybody with an income below four times the poverty line, or $98,400 for a family of four. The law created the mandate to make sure healthy people sign up, which ensures that insurers have enough money to pay bills for their sicker customers.

The transition to the new system has been difficult. When the law took effect in 2014, insurers canceled old plans (despite Obama’s “keep your plan” vow) and charged higher premiums for new ones. Consumers who qualified for little or no financial assistance felt the brunt of it. For the next few years, the majority of insurers lost money, largely because they weren’t attracting healthy people in the numbers they’d expected.

But in states likeCalifornia, where officials were fully committed to the program’s success, the new markets have mostly worked smoothly. And by 2016, most carriers were finding their way toprofitability. Although plenty of people continued to struggle with high premiums or out-of-pocket costs, millions had decent, affordable coverage they could not get before. And there were credible ideas on the table, from the likes of Democratic presidential candidateHillary Clinton, to help the rest.

Then Trump took over, unleashing a campaign of neglect andsabotage. He stopped paying a series of specialpaymentsto insurers that were the subject of a legal dispute. Insurers raised premiums in response. And that initial reduction in spending on healthcare.gov ads turned out to be a harbinger of more sweepingcutbacks― not just on advertising but also on the official “navigators” and “assisters” that the Affordable Care Act authorizes to help sign up new customers. Those groups are now operating at lower capacity, which means they’ll enroll fewer people. 

Until this year, getting people to shop for coverage was a priority for the federal government, with Obama personally promoting enrollment through venues like the comedy show “Between Two Ferns.” Trump, by contrast, has declared the law “finished” and “dead.” Seema Verma, chief administrator at the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, hasn’t issued a single tweet through her official account encouraging people to investigate their options ― even though, as Politico’sDan Diamondobserved, she sent out multiple messages encouraging seniors to check out their options for Medicare next year.

The people for whom advertising makes a difference tend to be the ones who don’t think about insurance because, at least for the moment, they are healthy. That’s a problem for insurance companies, who need those customers ― and it’s going to be an even bigger problem if the mandate goes away.

Economists have historically considered the mandate essential to a well-functioning market system, and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Officehas said that, without the mandate, the number of people buying private coverage on their own would drop by 5 million and premiums for these people would rise by 10 percent as insurers adjust for a customer base more tilted toward people with serious medical problems.

It’s possible that estimate is high, and CBO may yet revise that prediction downward. As HuffPost’sJeffrey Youngreported Saturday, not every insurer faces the same kind of market ― or is likely to react in the same way. But changes to the mandate are bound to interact with other changes soon to come.

Any day now, the Trump administration will unveil a proposal to change the regulation ofshort-duration insurance plans. These are plans that don’t typically include mental health or other essential benefits the Affordable Care Act requires, and they are almost never available to people with pre-existing conditions ― which means insurers can sell them for a lot less money.

Once the Affordable Care Act took effect, the Obama administration decided short-term plans would not count toward satisfying the individual mandate and that, as of this year, they could last no more than three months. As with so many other decisions the Obama administration made, this was both an effort to protect people from insurance that would leave them exposed to catastrophic medical bills as well to make sure insurers selling comprehensive, regulated plans weren’t losing healthy customers to cheaper alternatives unavailable to the sick.

The Trump administration plans to alter those rules, and, although the details are not public, it’s likely that the plans will officially be available for up to a year, as they were previously, and that they will count toward the mandate, if the mandate still exists. If healthy people can buy these plans for longer than three months and can do so without incurring a financial penalty from the mandate, many more are likely to choose that option ― causing insurance markets to deteriorate even more as premiums for comprehensive policies go up and more people seek out cheaper, if less secure, alternatives. 

How Medicaid Is Changing

It’s through the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of Medicaid that the majority of newly insured Americans have found coverage. The expansion offered states extra money if they’d open up the program to anybody with income below or just above the poverty line.Thirty-two statesplus the District of Columbia have done that.

Now that progress is in jeopardy. Republicans want to end federal funding for the expansion because, they say, Medicaid should only be for a few narrow classes of people: children, pregnant women, the elderly and people with disabilities. Republicans also want to reduce federal spending on Medicaid more generally, because they say the program costs too much. The long-term goal is to do all of this through legislation. For now, the Trump administration is making headway by using its executive authority to scale back the program, bit by bit.

Federal law sketches out the basics of the Medicaid program, including who and what it must cover. But states can apply forwaiversfrom some of these requirements and, in order to save money, they frequently seek to serve fewer people or provide them with weaker guarantees of coverage.

The Obama administration tended to look upon such applications skeptically, arguing they violated Medicaid’s federal guidelines. In March, the Trump administration announced it would look upon such applications more favorably. Already the Trump administration has approved several state requests to eliminate what’s known as “retroactive eligibility,” under which Medicaid pays the prior three months of medical bills for newly enrolled people who would have been eligible during that time. It’s a way to reimburse the hospitals, clinics, and other health care providers who take care of people who show up without insurance. It’s also a way to protect people who are eligible for Medicaid, but don’t realize it until they get sick.

Going forward, the Trump administration has also said it will approve state requests to imposework requirementson Medicaid. This is a big issue for Republicans who say that government-financed health insurance should be conditional upon having a job or actively looking for one. As it happens, that’s already true for the majority of people on the program ― and of that small percentage who are not working or seeking work, a substantial proportion are busy caring for relatives, according to studies. But imposing work requirements reliably reduces enrollment, partly by adding one more layer to the application and qualification process, making it more difficult to get on and then stay on the program.

A less obvious way the administration and its allies are scaling back Medicaid is by trying to take away the mandate, which creates an expectation that everybody should have insurance, prompting people to investigate their coverage options. Inevitably, some portion discover they are eligible for Medicaid, which is essentially free. This was very much how the Affordable Care Act’s architects hoped the program would work. But it means more people end up on Medicaid, and that’s not what Republicans want. 

Who Will Get The Blame

It’s impossible to be certain how all of these changes, taken together, would play out. But one possibility is that private insurance markets in much of the country would splitinto two groups, as observers like Duke University’sDavid Andersonand Vox’sDylan Scotthave sketched out in the last few weeks.

Here’s how it’d go: As premiums go up, the tax credits would too, guaranteeing a lucrative market that at least some insurers would always want to serve. People who qualify for those credits would continue to have comprehensive coverage available at reasonable prices. And they represent the majority of people buying insurance on their own.

But the tax credits aren’t free. They come out of the federal treasury, which means that, ironically, Republican efforts could mean more federal spending to maintain the subsidized markets. More important, the people who don’t qualify for tax credits ― the ones with incomes that are more than four times the poverty line ― would increasingly find comprehensive, regulated coverage simply unaffordable, even more so than they do today.

Some would react by figuring out ways to reduce their income in order to get just below the subsidy threshold. The rest would seek out cheaper alternatives, like those short-term plans and “health care ministries,” in which Christians share each other’s medical bills. These options, although generally better than no coverage at all, provide less reliable protection from medical bills, as writers likeJulie Applebyof Kaiser Health News andLaura Turnerof BuzzFeed have detailed.

For people who don’t qualify for tax credits, the market for insurance would look a lot like it did before the Affordable Care Act took effect ― with coverage that works primarily for people who are in good health and stay that way. “I think we could get to that point relatively quickly in some markets,”Sean Mullin, a senior director of the consulting firm Leavitt Partners, told HuffPost. “This isn’t 10 years off. This could be the case next year.”

A lot would depend on where people live. States including California and Maryland where officials are most committed to expanding health insurance would probably continue doing what they do now: promote enrollment aggressively, using their regulatory powers to restrict plans that don’t live up to the Affordable Care Act’s standards, and maybe even creating their own versions of the individual mandate. These states would be unlikely to seek the Medicaid waivers that the Trump administration is so eager to grant.

It’d be a different story in the places where officials are seeking to limit or even undermine the Affordable Care Act’s reach. A handful of states, such as Iowa,already have deeply damaged markets ― with premiums that are way too expensive for most people who don’t qualify for subsidies ― and Medicaid programs that have been weakened. If Republicans continue to remake the Affordable Care Act as they have so far, more states will be in the same situation.

If this comes to pass, Trump and the Republicans will surely continue to blame Obama and demand repeal. But for all of the Affordable Care Act’s very real shortcomings, it has helped millions to get coverage and provided guarantees that Americans happen to value. If those trends reverse ― if more people end up struggling with access and medical bills ― it won’t be on the people who created the Affordable Care Act. It’ll be on the people running it now.

CORRECTION:A previous version of this story misstated the name of the comedy show on which former President Barack Obama appeared to promote insurance enrollment. It is “Between Two Ferns,” not “Between the Ferns.”

This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

  • Avoid NVIDIA, Add These 4 Top-Ranked Semi Stocks to Portfolio
    Finance
    Zacks

    Avoid NVIDIA, Add These 4 Top-Ranked Semi Stocks to Portfolio

    NVIDIA Corporation’s NVDA lower-than-expected top and bottom-line results left it tremendously stressed ever since its quarterly earnings release on Nov 15. Further, this Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) stock is currently one of the worst performers, lagging the S&P 500 index and the industry it belongs to over the past year. Shares of NVIDIA have plunged 31% in the past year compared with the industry’s 9% decline.

  • Jamie Dimon and Warren Buffett Have the Last Laugh on Bitcoin
    Business
    Bloomberg

    Jamie Dimon and Warren Buffett Have the Last Laugh on Bitcoin

    Bitcoin was meant to make all of its investors rich, something that held particular appeal to a millennial generation hungry for a financial boost in a world of crushing student debt, income inequality and low quality jobs.

  • Apple announces it will take part in Black Friday 2018, with days of deals
    News
    The Independent

    Apple announces it will take part in Black Friday 2018, with days of deals

    Apple will be taking part in Black Friday, the company has confirmed. Customers will have to wait until Friday to find out what they actually are, however, with Apple only announcing that it will be running offers between 23 and 26 November. Apple has traditionally resisted Black Friday, instead running small offers but not slashing prices or offering deep discounts.

  • Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Gains As Market Dips: What You Should Know
    Finance
    Zacks

    Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Gains As Market Dips: What You Should Know

    This has lagged the Computer and Technology sector's loss of 5.96% and the S&P 500's loss of 2.57% in that time. AMD's full-year Zacks Consensus Estimates are calling for earnings of $0.46 per share and revenue of $6.54 billion. As a result, we can interpret positive estimate revisions as a good sign for the company's business outlook.

  • Finance
    Investopedia

    The Worst is Yet to Come for Stocks: Morgan Stanley

    Investors looking for solace amid the wave of market sell-offs may argue that the S&P 500 has fallen only 9% from its all-time highs in September, hardly a devastating decline. “Not only does the price action this year suggest we are in the midst of a bear market—more than 40 percent of the stocks in the S&P 500 are down at least 20 percent—but it also trades like a bear market,” wrote the bank’s analysts.

  • What You Must Know About AT&T Inc’s (NYSE:T) Financial Strength
    Finance
    Simply Wall St.

    What You Must Know About AT&T Inc’s (NYSE:T) Financial Strength

    Investors seeking to preserve capital in a volatile environment might consider large-cap stocks such as AT&T Inc (NYSE:T) a safer option. Today we will look at AT&T’s financial liquidity and debt levels, which are strong indicators for whether the company can weather economic downturns or fund strategic acquisitions for future growth. Remember this is a very top-level look that focuses exclusively on financial health, so I recommend a deeper analysis into T here.

  • 'Saudi Arabia was declared guilty without people seeing e...
    World
    CNBC Videos

    'Saudi Arabia was declared guilty without people seeing e...

    Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir speaks to CNBC about the U.S. reaction to the Jamal Khashoggi case.

  • 4 Retail Stocks to Buy This Thanksgiving Weekend
    Finance
    Zacks

    4 Retail Stocks to Buy This Thanksgiving Weekend

    An optimistic economic outlook coupled with improved consumer confidence could boost retail stocks this holiday season. More consumers are expected to visit brick-and-mortar stores to grab promotions and deals. According to an annual survey by National Retail Federation (NRF) and Prosper Insights & Analytics, 164 million consumers could go shopping Thanksgiving Day through Cyber Monday.

  • Finance
    Market Realist

    Why Baozun Inc. Is Soaring Over 15%

    Baozun Inc. (Nasdaq: BZUN), often referred to as “the Shopify of China,” is up over 15% at the open of today’s trading session following the release of its third-quarter earnings results earlier this morning.

  • Some Hedge Funds Are Crazy About Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)
    Finance
    Insider Monkey

    Some Hedge Funds Are Crazy About Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)

    Is Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) a good investment right now? Hedge funds spend millions of dollars on Ivy League graduates, expert networks, and get tips from industry insiders. Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) was in 31 hedge funds' portfolios at the end of the third quarter of 2018.

  • Why L Brands (LB) is Such a Great Value Stock Pick Right Now
    Finance
    Zacks

    Why L Brands (LB) is Such a Great Value Stock Pick Right Now

    Value investing is always a very popular strategy, and for good reason. After all, who doesn’t want to find stocks that have low PEs, solid outlooks, and decent dividends?Fortunately for investors looking for this combination, we have identified a strong

  • Trump just sent the wrong message on a brutal day in the stock markets
    Finance
    Yahoo Finance

    Trump just sent the wrong message on a brutal day in the stock markets

    On a brutal day in the stock markets the last thing investors want to see is another attack on the Federal Reserve by President Donald Trump. Trump reportedly told a group of reporters on Tuesday that he would like to see lower interest rates from the Federal Reserve. The president added that the biggest problem right now isn’t the trade war with China (among other geopolitical issues), but rather the Jerome Powell led Federal Reserve.

  • 3 Dividend Stocks for Income
    Business
    Motley Fool

    3 Dividend Stocks for Income

    Dividend-paying stocks are like the ballast that keeps a ship from capsizing during stormy seas. They provide grounding for investors who, when markets are volatile, just as we're experiencing now, may otherwise get queasy from being tossed around. Knowing

  • Mylan Recalls Valsartan Lots, Gets FDA Warning for Facility
    Finance
    Zacks

    Mylan Recalls Valsartan Lots, Gets FDA Warning for Facility

    Mylan N.V. MYL announced that it would voluntary recall select lots of blood pressure medicine Valsartan in the United States. Mylan stated that it would recall at least 15 lots of medicines containing valsartan distributed in the United States between March 2017 and November 2018 and manufactured by units Mylan Pharmaceuticals and Mylan Laboratories. The company also commented on a Warning Letter it received from the FDA on Nov 9, which raised concerns related to its manufacturing facility in Morgantown, WV.

  • Is Canopy Growth the Google of Weed?
    Business
    Motley Fool

    Is Canopy Growth the Google of Weed?

    When CEOs compare a company to Google, it's usually viewed as a positive for the company. Of course, such comparisons typically actually reference Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL), the parent company of Google, which was known as Google prior to 2015. After all, Alphabet is one of the world's largest, most successful, and most innovative companies.

  • Where Will Home Depot Be in 5 Years?
    Business
    Motley Fool

    Where Will Home Depot Be in 5 Years?

    For longtime Home Depot Inc. (NYSE: HD) investors, third-quarter 2018 was more of the same. Net sales rose to $26.3 billion, a 5.1% increase year over year, and diluted earnings per share (EPS) grew to $2.51, a 36.4% jump year over year, as reported by the company earlier this month. Shareholders are used to the giant home-improvement retailer realizing strong quarterly results, yet shares of Home Depot are now down about 7% year to date, trailing the S&P 500 index by about 10% over the same period.

  • Facebook investors could double their money in three to f...
    Business
    CNBC Videos

    Facebook investors could double their money in three to f...

    Lewis Piantedosi, Eaton Vance portfolio manager, and Whitney Tilson, Kase Learning founder, discuss their take on Facebook's stock as CEO Mark Zuckerberg sits down for an interview with CNN.

  • Is Hecla Mining Company a Buy?
    Business
    Motley Fool

    Is Hecla Mining Company a Buy?

    Shares of Hecla Mining (NYSE: HL) have shed nearly 40% of their value this year. It's not alone; CEO Phil Baker led off the company's recent third-quarter call by stating: "I want to start by acknowledging that while gold and silver have declined 7% and

  • These High-Yield Dividend Stocks Are Down 30% in 2018. Time to Buy?
    Business
    Motley Fool

    These High-Yield Dividend Stocks Are Down 30% in 2018. Time to Buy?

    Three dividend stocks -- liquefied natural gas shipper Golar LNG Partners (NASDAQ: GMLP), oil and gas drilling rig lessor Nabors Industries (NYSE: NBR), and specialty chemical manufacturer Kronos Worldwide (NYSE: KRO) -- have been hit particularly hard in 2018, so much so that their dividend yields are now north of 4.5%.

  • 3 Top Large-Cap Stocks to Buy in November
    Business
    Motley Fool

    3 Top Large-Cap Stocks to Buy in November

    Large-cap stocks typically provide investors with consistency and stability, two features investors are sorely lacking from the rest of the market these days. While not a guarantee against suffering whipsaws in volatility, large-cap stocks can provide investors with a bit more than a modicum of reassurance that they will be around tomorrow when all is said and done. Three Motley Fool contributors selected AbbVie (NYSE: ABBV), 3M (NYSE: MMM), and Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) as large-cap stocks to buy in November.

  • Here's Why Investors Should Bet on Twitter (TWTR) Right Now
    Finance
    Zacks

    Here's Why Investors Should Bet on Twitter (TWTR) Right Now

    Twitter TWTR is firing on all cylinders. This Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stock has gained 29.4% year-to-date outperforming the S&P 500 Composite’s decline of 1.2%. The company’s focus on adding plethora of new features and security initiatives that are

  • What Do Analysts Think About The Southern Company’s (NYSE:SO) Future?
    Finance
    Simply Wall St.

    What Do Analysts Think About The Southern Company’s (NYSE:SO) Future?

    As The Southern Company (NYSE:SO) announced its earnings release on 30 September 2018, analysts seem fairly confident, with earnings expected to grow by 25% in the upcoming year relative to the past 5-year average growth rate of -3.8%. In this article, I’ve outline a few earnings growth rates to give you a sense of the market sentiment for Southern in the longer term. The 15 analysts covering SO view its longer term outlook with a positive sentiment.

  • XOM, CVX, Shell, and BP’s Valuations after Their Earnings
    Finance
    Market Realist

    XOM, CVX, Shell, and BP’s Valuations after Their Earnings

    XOM, CVX, RDS, and BP Stocks Fell in Q4, Oil Prices Fell 25% (Continued from Prior Part) Integrated energy stocks’ valuation Previously, we reviewed the changes in integrated energy stocks’ short interest. In this part, we’ll compare ExxonMobil (XOM)

  • Here's Why You Should Add Exelon (EXC) to Your Portfolio
    Finance
    Zacks

    Here's Why You Should Add Exelon (EXC) to Your Portfolio

    Earnings estimates for Exelon Corporation EXC have been revised upward in the past 60 days. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2018 and 2019 has moved up 0.6% and 2.3% to $3.12 and $3.15, respectively.The stock has returned 11.5% in the last 12 months compared

  • Finance
    InvestorPlace

    Follow Citron and Buy the Dip in Nvidia Stock

    A few weeks ago, everyone on Wall Street was talking about how chipmaker Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) was ready to rally to $400 on AI and data-related tailwinds. Now, one cryptocurrency plagued quarter later, Nvidia stock is trading down at $140 and no one wants to buy it. The widely followed short-seller, who has been a vocal bear on Nvidia stock for the past several years, turned bullish on NVDA after the recent correction.