Advertisement
U.S. markets closed
  • S&P 500

    4,604.37
    +18.78 (+0.41%)
     
  • Dow 30

    36,247.87
    +130.49 (+0.36%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    14,403.97
    +63.98 (+0.45%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    1,880.82
    +12.57 (+0.67%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    71.26
    +1.92 (+2.77%)
     
  • Gold

    2,020.80
    -25.60 (-1.25%)
     
  • Silver

    23.29
    -0.77 (-3.20%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0764
    -0.0034 (-0.31%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2450
    +0.1160 (+2.81%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2551
    -0.0043 (-0.34%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    144.8930
    +0.7020 (+0.49%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    44,248.41
    +757.85 (+1.74%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    914.81
    +18.10 (+2.02%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,554.47
    +40.75 (+0.54%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    32,307.86
    -550.45 (-1.68%)
     

Riskified Ltd. (NYSE:RSKD) is definitely on the radar of institutional investors who own 31% of the company

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Riskified's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • 50% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders

  • 16% of Riskified is held by insiders

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Riskified Ltd. (NYSE:RSKD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 31% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Riskified.

Check out our latest analysis for Riskified

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Riskified?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Riskified. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Riskified, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Riskified. Our data shows that Genesis Partners Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 8.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Assaf Feldman and Qumra Capital are the second and third largest shareholders. Assaf Feldman, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive. In addition, we found that Eido Gal, the CEO has 4.2% of the shares allocated to their name.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Riskified

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Riskified Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$849m, and insiders have US$134m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in Riskified. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Equity Ownership

With an ownership of 26%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Riskified is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Advertisement