NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 19, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
Hecla Mining Company (HL)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/hecla-mining-company-loss-submission-form?prid=2505&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: July 23, 2019
Class Period: March 19, 2018 to May 8, 2019
Allegations against HL include that: (a) the Nevada operations were hemorrhaging cash due to a multitude of material problems identified by Defendants during Hecla’s extensive due diligence of the Nevada mines before the Class Period, and (b) as a result of these material problems, Defendants had no reasonable basis for their representations that the Nevada operations would be in a position to have positive or self-funding cash flow.
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/mammoth-energy-services-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=2505&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 9, 2019
Class Period: October 19, 2017 to June 5, 2019
Allegations against TUSK include that: (1) Mammoth’s subsidiary, Cobra, improperly obtained two infrastructure contracts with PREPA that totaled over $1.8 billion; (2) specifically, the contracts were awarded as the result of improper steering and not a competitive RFP process; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ statements about Mammoth’s business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
Box, Inc. (BOX)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/box-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=2505&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 5, 2019
Class Period: November 28, 2018 to June 3, 2019
Allegations against BOX include that: (1) the Company was unable to close large deals within the quarter; (2) that, as a result, the Company’s revenue would be materially impacted; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email email@example.com or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
New York, NY 10002
SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong
View source version on accesswire.com: