NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 4, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
Infosys Limited (INFY)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/infosys-limited-loss-submission-form?prid=4714&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 23, 2019
Class Period: July 7, 2018 to October 20, 2019
Allegations against INFY include that: (1) the Company improperly recognized revenues to inflate short-term profits; (2) Chief Executive Officer Salil Parekh bypassed reviews and approvals for large deals to avoid accounting scrutiny; (3) management pressured the Company's finance team to hide information from auditors and the Company's Board of Directors; and (4) as a result of the aforementioned misconduct, Defendants' statements about Infosys's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and/or misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
Pareteum Corporation (TEUM)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/pareteum-corporation-loss-submission-form?prid=4714&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 23, 2019
Class Period: December 14, 2017 to October 21, 2019
Allegations against TEUM include that: (a) it was not true that the Company's purported success was the result of hyper-demand for Pareteum's unique products or exceptional service, or the Company's competent management; but, in fact, Defendants had propped up the Company's results by manipulating Pareteum's accounting for revenues, income, and the important Backlog metric; (b) Defendants had materially overstated the Company's profitability by failing to properly account for the Company's results of operations and by artificially inflating the Company's financial results; (c) it was not true that Pareteum contained even the most minimally adequate systems of internal operational or financial controls necessary to assure that Pareteum's reported financial statements were true, accurate, and/or reliable; (d) as a result, it also was not true that the Company's financial statements and reports were prepared in accordance with GAAP and SEC rules; and (e) as a result of the aforementioned adverse conditions, Defendants lacked any reasonable basis to claim that Pareteum was operating according to plan, or that Pareteum could achieve the guidance sponsored and/or endorsed by Defendants.
Grubhub Inc. (GRUB)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/grubhub-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=4714&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 20, 2020
Class Period: July 30, 2019 to October 28, 2019
Allegations against GRUB include that: (i) customer orders were actually declining, despite the massive investments that the Company had made to spur demand for and use of its platform; (ii) Grubhub's new customer additions were generating significantly lower revenues as compared to historic cohorts because these customers were more prone to using competitor platforms; (iii) Grubhub's vaunted business model under which it secured exclusive partnerships had failed, and Grubhub needed to engage in the same aggressive nonpartnered sales tactics embraced by its competitors to generate significant revenue growth; (iv) Grubhub was required to spend substantial additional capital in order to grow revenues and retain market share in the face of heightened competitive dynamics and market saturation, eviscerating the Company's profitability; and (v) Grubhub was tracking tens of millions of dollars below its revenue and earnings guidance and such guidance lacked any reasonable basis.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email firstname.lastname@example.org or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
New York, NY 10002
SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong
View source version on accesswire.com: