NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / August 25, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
3M Company (MMM)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/3m-company-loss-submission-form?prid=3168&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 27, 2019
Class Period: February 9, 2017 to May 28, 2019
Allegations against MMM include that: (i) 3M had vast internal evidence dating back decades confirming that polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) are toxic (which was first publicly revealed in February 2018 by Minnesota’s Attorney General); (ii) 3M had a decades-long history of suppressing negative information and/or damaging data about PFAS; and (iii) 3M has legal exposure to state, county, and local governments and individuals around the country as a result of its knowledge and intentional concealment of the toxic harm caused by the use of PFAS.
GTT Communications, Inc. (GTT)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/gtt-communications-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=3168&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 30, 2019
Class Period: February 26, 2018 to July 1, 2019
Allegations against GTT include that: (1) following GTT's acquisition of Interoute Communications Holdings S.A., there were delays in migrating Interoute’s legacy systems and processes into GTT’s client management database system; (2) Interoute had made a strategic priority shift to sell cloud services that was a higher percentage of Interoute’s sales in the two years leading up to the acquisition; (3) a material percentage of the Interoute sales representatives were not productive at selling GTT’s core cloud networking services; (4) GTT was unable to yield as many Interoute salespeople because Interoute had hired many sales people focused on cloud services and allowed underperforming sales representatives to remain at Interoute; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/granite-construction-incorporated-loss-submission-form?prid=3168&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: October 15, 2019
Class Period: October 26, 2018 to August 1, 2019
Allegations against GVA include that: (1) the Company had assumed certain risks in connection with its heavy civil joint venture projects bid between 2012 and 2014; (2) there was an “untenable” imbalance of risk sharing between the Company and the joint venture project owners; (3) as a result, the Company was reasonably likely to incur additional project costs for its joint venture projects; (4) the Company was reasonably likely to incur additional costs in connection with certain project disputes; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email email@example.com or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
New York, NY 10002
SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong
View source version on accesswire.com: