NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 8, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/quad-graphics-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=4775&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 6, 2020
Class Period: February 21, 2018 to October 29, 2019
Allegations against QUAD include that: (1) the Company's book business in United States was underperforming; (2) as a result, the Company was likely to divest its book business; (3) the Company was unreasonably vulnerable to decreases in market prices; (4) to remain financially flexible while market prices decreased, the Company was likely to cut its quarterly dividend and expand its cost reduction programs; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (AFI)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/armstrong-flooring-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=4775&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 14, 2020
Class Period: March 6, 2018 to November 4, 2019
Allegations against AFI include that: (1) the Company had engaged in channel stuffing to artificially boost sales; (2) the Company's internal control over inventory levels was not effective; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis
Grubhub Inc. (GRUB)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/grubhub-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=4775&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 20, 2020
Class Period: July 30, 2019 to October 28, 2019
Allegations against GRUB include that: (i) customer orders were actually declining, despite the massive investments that the Company had made to spur demand for and use of its platform; (ii) Grubhub's new customer additions were generating significantly lower revenues as compared to historic cohorts because these customers were more prone to using competitor platforms; (iii) Grubhub's vaunted business model under which it secured exclusive partnerships had failed, and Grubhub needed to engage in the same aggressive nonpartnered sales tactics embraced by its competitors to generate significant revenue growth; (iv) Grubhub was required to spend substantial additional capital in order to grow revenues and retain market share in the face of heightened competitive dynamics and market saturation, eviscerating the Company's profitability; and (v) Grubhub was tracking tens of millions of dollars below its revenue and earnings guidance and such guidance lacked any reasonable basis.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email firstname.lastname@example.org or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
New York, NY 10002
SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong
View source version on accesswire.com: