NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 18, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
Sunlands Technology Group (STG)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/sunlands-technology-group-loss-submission-form?prid=2490&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 26, 2019
Class Period: shareholders of Sunlands Technology Group who purchased shares pursuant and/or traceable to Sunlands’ March 2018 initial public stock offering.
Allegations against STG include that: (1) Sunlands’ student enrollment was declining; (2) Sunlands’ gross billings were declining; (3) Sunlands' marketing tactics were not as robust as described in the Registration Statement; and (4) as a result, Defendants’ statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
Box, Inc. (BOX)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/box-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=2490&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 5, 2019
Class Period: November 28, 2018 to June 3, 2019
Allegations against BOX include that: (1) the Company was unable to close large deals within the quarter; (2) that, as a result, the Company’s revenue would be materially impacted; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
Realogy Holdings Corp. (RLGY)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/realogy-holdings-corp-loss-submission-form?prid=2490&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 9, 2019
Class Period: February 24, 2017 to May 22, 2019
Allegations against RLGY include that: (1) Realogy was engaged in anticompetitive behavior by requiring property sellers to pay the commissions of a buyer’s broker at an inflated rate; (2) Realogy’s anticompetitive actions would prompt the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to open an antitrust investigation into the real estate industry’s practices regarding brokers’ commissions; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ statements about the Realogy’s business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email email@example.com or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
New York, NY 10002
SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong
View source version on accesswire.com: