NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / August 6, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/mammoth-energy-services-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=2792&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 9, 2019
Class Period: October 19, 2017 to June 5, 2019
Allegations against TUSK include that: (1) Mammoth’s subsidiary, Cobra, improperly obtained two infrastructure contracts with PREPA that totaled over $1.8 billion; (2) specifically, the contracts were awarded as the result of improper steering and not a competitive RFP process; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ statements about Mammoth’s business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
Cloudera, Inc. (CLDR)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/cloudera-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=2792&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 6, 2019
Class Period: April 28, 2017 to June 5, 2019
Allegations against CLDR include that: (i) Cloudera was finding it increasingly difficult to identify large enterprises interested in adopting the Company’s Hadoop-based platform; (ii) Cloudera needed to expend an increasing amount of capital on sales and marketing activities to generate new revenues, even as new revenue opportunities were diminishing; and (iii) Cloudera had materially diminished sales opportunities and prospects and could not generate annual positive cash flows.
Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/cardinal-health-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=2792&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 30, 2019
Class Period: March 2, 2015 to May 2, 2018
Allegations against CAH include that: 1) following Cardinal's acquisition of Cordis, the RFID [radio-frequency identification] inventory tracking technology and advanced supply chain solutions that Defendants told investors the Company would to use to improve Cordis’s performance were never implemented across Cordis; 2) Cordis’s antiquated and ineffective global supply chain was causing operational and inventory problems at Cordis; 3) as a result, Cordis manufactured and accumulated excessive amounts of cardiovascular product inventories, which sat on the shelf and became unsellable and/or expired; 4) the Company materially overstated Cordis’s inventory balances; 5) Cordis was not “performing well” and its integration was not “on track,” “going incredibly well” or “largely on plan"; and 6) to correct Cordis’s deficiencies, the Company would have to make substantial investments in Cordis’s IT and supporting infrastructure, thereby incurring significant Selling, General and Administrative Expenses charges beyond the levels internally budgeted or projected by Cardinal and diminishing operating earnings.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email firstname.lastname@example.org or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
New York, NY 10002
SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong
View source version on accesswire.com: