NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / August 1, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/mammoth-energy-services-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=2718&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 9, 2019
Class Period: October 19, 2017 to June 5, 2019
Allegations against TUSK include that: (1) Mammoth’s subsidiary, Cobra, improperly obtained two infrastructure contracts with PREPA that totaled over $1.8 billion; (2) specifically, the contracts were awarded as the result of improper steering and not a competitive RFP process; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ statements about Mammoth’s business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/eagle-bancorp-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=2718&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 23, 2019
Class Period: March 2, 2015 to July 17, 2019
Allegations against EGBN include that: (i) Eagle Bancorp’s internal controls and procedures and compliance policies were inadequate; (ii) the foregoing shortcoming created a foreseeable risk of heightened regulatory scrutiny and the need for the Company undertake its own internal investigations; and (iii) as a result, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
GTT Communications, Inc. (GTT)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/gtt-communications-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=2718&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 30, 2019
Class Period: February 26, 2018 to July 1, 2019
Allegations against GTT include that: (i) following GTT's acquisition of Interoute Communications Holdings S.A., there were delays in migrating Interoute’s legacy systems and processes into GTT’s client management database system; (2) Interoute had made a strategic priority shift to sell cloud services that was a higher percentage of Interoute’s sales in the two years leading up to the acquisition; (3) a material percentage of the Interoute sales representatives were not productive at selling GTT’s core cloud networking services; (4) GTT was unable to yield as many Interoute salespeople because Interoute had hired many sales people focused on cloud services and allowed underperforming sales representatives to remain at Interoute; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email email@example.com or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
New York, NY 10002
SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong
View source version on accesswire.com: