NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 6, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
Under Armour, Inc. (UA)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/under-armour-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=4753&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 6, 2020
Class Period: August 3, 2016 to November 1, 2019
Allegations against UA include that: (1) Under Armour shifted sales from quarter to quarter to appear healthier, including to keep pace with their long-running year-over-year 20% net revenue growth; (2) undisclosed to the investing public, the Company had been under investigation by and cooperating with the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission since at least July 2017; and (3) as a result, Defendants' statements about its business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
Grubhub Inc. (GRUB)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/grubhub-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=4753&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 20, 2020
Class Period: July 30, 2019 to October 28, 2019
Allegations against GRUB include that: (i) customer orders were actually declining, despite the massive investments that the Company had made to spur demand for and use of its platform; (ii) Grubhub's new customer additions were generating significantly lower revenues as compared to historic cohorts because these customers were more prone to using competitor platforms; (iii) Grubhub's vaunted business model under which it secured exclusive partnerships had failed, and Grubhub needed to engage in the same aggressive nonpartnered sales tactics embraced by its competitors to generate significant revenue growth; (iv) Grubhub was required to spend substantial additional capital in order to grow revenues and retain market share in the face of heightened competitive dynamics and market saturation, eviscerating the Company's profitability; and (v) Grubhub was tracking tens of millions of dollars below its revenue and earnings guidance and such guidance lacked any reasonable basis.
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. (FCAU)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/fiat-chrysler-automobiles-n-v-loss-submission-form?prid=4753&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 31, 2020
Class Period: February 26, 2016 to November 20, 2019
Allegations against FCAU include that: (1) the Company employed a bribery scheme to obtain favorable terms in its collective bargaining agreement with United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America; (2) high-ranking Fiat officials were aware of and authorized the scheme; and (3) as a result, Defendants' statements about Fiat's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and/or misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email email@example.com or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
New York, NY 10002
SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong
View source version on accesswire.com: