NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / November 8, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
Viewray, Inc. (VRAY)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/viewray-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=4287&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: November 12, 2019
Class Period: March 15, 2019 to August 8, 2019
Allegations against VRAY include that: (a) demand for ViewRay systems had declined due in part to changes being made to Medicare reimbursement approaches first announced in November 2019 that could make purchases of new ViewRay systems less profitable for customers; (b) the Company's reported backlog was overstated due to the inclusion of orders with insufficient surety as to permit for their inclusion in reported backlog; and (c) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about ViewRay's business metrics and financial prospects during the Class Period were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
iRobot Corporation (IRBT)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/irobot-corporation-loss-submission-form?prid=4287&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 23, 2019
Class Period: November 21, 2016 to October 22, 2019
The filed complaint alleges that defendants misrepresented the reason for iRobot's acquisitions of Tokyo-based Sales on Demand Corporation and privately-held Robopolis SAS, which was to control the Company's largest distributors so that defendants could inflate sales and revenue figures by stuffing the channel. Defendants further misled investors by repeatedly telling them throughout the Class Period that the Company was seeing continued double-digit revenue growth, and by attributing the growth to increased demand for the Roomba vacuums, when in reality defendants were engaging in channel-stuffing to artificially boost sales. Defendants also misstated that the Company's channel inventory levels had not changed and would not change dramatically from quarter to quarter or year over year, when in fact iRobot was deliberately stuffing the channel in order to claim false revenue growth.
Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/quad-graphics-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=4287&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 6, 2020
Class Period: February 21, 2018 to October 29, 2019
Allegations against QUAD include that: (1) the Company's book business in United States was underperforming; (2) as a result, the Company was likely to divest its book business; (3) the Company was unreasonably vulnerable to decreases in market prices; (4) to remain financially flexible while market prices decreased, the Company was likely to cut its quarterly dividend and expand its cost reduction programs; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email firstname.lastname@example.org or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
New York, NY 10002
SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong
View source version on accesswire.com: