U.S. Markets closed

Is SKAKO A/S’s (CPH:SKAKO) 16% ROCE Any Good?

Simply Wall St

Today we'll evaluate SKAKO A/S (CPH:SKAKO) to determine whether it could have potential as an investment idea. Specifically, we're going to calculate its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), in the hopes of getting some insight into the business.

First of all, we'll work out how to calculate ROCE. Second, we'll look at its ROCE compared to similar companies. Finally, we'll look at how its current liabilities affect its ROCE.

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What is it?

ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. In general, businesses with a higher ROCE are usually better quality. Overall, it is a valuable metric that has its flaws. Renowned investment researcher Michael Mauboussin has suggested that a high ROCE can indicate that 'one dollar invested in the company generates value of more than one dollar'.

How Do You Calculate Return On Capital Employed?

The formula for calculating the return on capital employed is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

Or for SKAKO:

0.16 = ø20m ÷ (ø258m - ø134m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2019.)

Therefore, SKAKO has an ROCE of 16%.

View our latest analysis for SKAKO

Does SKAKO Have A Good ROCE?

ROCE is commonly used for comparing the performance of similar businesses. In our analysis, SKAKO's ROCE is meaningfully higher than the 11% average in the Machinery industry. We would consider this a positive, as it suggests it is using capital more effectively than other similar companies. Independently of how SKAKO compares to its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms appears decent, and the company may be worthy of closer investigation.

The image below shows how SKAKO's ROCE compares to its industry, and you can click it to see more detail on its past growth.

CPSE:SKAKO Past Revenue and Net Income, February 2nd 2020

When considering ROCE, bear in mind that it reflects the past and does not necessarily predict the future. Companies in cyclical industries can be difficult to understand using ROCE, as returns typically look high during boom times, and low during busts. ROCE is, after all, simply a snap shot of a single year. How cyclical is SKAKO? You can see for yourself by looking at this free graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

Do SKAKO's Current Liabilities Skew Its ROCE?

Short term (or current) liabilities, are things like supplier invoices, overdrafts, or tax bills that need to be paid within 12 months. Due to the way ROCE is calculated, a high level of current liabilities makes a company look as though it has less capital employed, and thus can (sometimes unfairly) boost the ROCE. To check the impact of this, we calculate if a company has high current liabilities relative to its total assets.

SKAKO has current liabilities of ø134m and total assets of ø258m. Therefore its current liabilities are equivalent to approximately 52% of its total assets. This is admittedly a high level of current liabilities, improving ROCE substantially.

Our Take On SKAKO's ROCE

The ROCE would not look as appealing if the company had fewer current liabilities. There might be better investments than SKAKO out there, but you will have to work hard to find them . These promising businesses with rapidly growing earnings might be right up your alley.

If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of growing companies that insiders are buying.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.