Can Stellar AfricaGold Inc (CVE:SPX) Improve Your Portfolio Returns?

In this article:

If you are looking to invest in Stellar AfricaGold Inc’s (TSXV:SPX), or currently own the stock, then you need to understand its beta in order to understand how it can affect the risk of your portfolio. Every stock in the market is exposed to market risk, which arises from macroeconomic factors such as economic growth and geo-political tussles just to name a few. This is measured by its beta. Not every stock is exposed to the same level of market risk, and the broad market index represents a beta value of one. A stock with a beta greater than one is expected to exhibit higher volatility resulting from market-wide shocks compared to one with a beta below one.

See our latest analysis for Stellar AfricaGold

An interpretation of SPX’s beta

With a beta of 1.04, Stellar AfricaGold is a stock that tends to experience more gains than the market during a growth phase and also a bigger reduction in value compared to the market during a broad downturn. Based on this beta value, SPX may be a stock for investors with a portfolio mainly made up of low-beta stocks. This is because during times of bullish sentiment, you can reap more of the upside with high-beta stocks compared to muted movements of low-beta holdings.

How does SPX’s size and industry impact its risk?

A market capitalisation of CA$2.31M puts SPX in the category of small-cap stocks, which tends to possess higher beta than larger companies. Moreover, SPX’s industry, metals and mining, is considered to be cyclical, which means it is more volatile than the market over the economic cycle. As a result, we should expect higher beta for small-cap stocks in a cyclical industry compared to larger stocks in a defensive industry. This is consistent with SPX’s individual beta value we discussed above. Next, we will examine the fundamental factors which can cause cyclicality in the stock.

TSXV:SPX Income Statement Apr 12th 18
TSXV:SPX Income Statement Apr 12th 18

How SPX’s assets could affect its beta

An asset-heavy company tends to have a higher beta because the risk associated with running fixed assets during a downturn is highly expensive. I test SPX’s ratio of fixed assets to total assets in order to determine how high the risk is associated with this type of constraint. Given a fixed to total assets ratio of over 30%, SPX seems to be a company which invests a big chunk of its capital on assets that cannot be scaled down on short-notice. As a result, this aspect of SPX indicates a higher beta than a similar size company with a lower portion of fixed assets on their balance sheet. Similarly, SPX’s beta value conveys the same message.

What this means for you:

You may reap the gains of SPX’s returns in times of an economic boom. Though the business does have higher fixed cost than what is considered safe, during times of growth, consumer demand may be high enough to not warrant immediate concerns. However, during a downturn, a more defensive stock can cushion the impact of this risk. What I have not mentioned in my article here are important company-specific fundamentals such as Stellar AfricaGold’s financial health and performance track record. I urge you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

  1. Financial Health: Is SPX’s operations financially sustainable? Balance sheets can be hard to analyze, which is why we’ve done it for you. Check out our financial health checks here.

  2. Past Track Record: Has SPX been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of SPX’s historicals for more clarity.

  3. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.

Advertisement