U.S. Markets close in 3 hrs 52 mins

Should You Be Tempted To Buy Thai Beverage Public Company Limited (SGX:Y92) At Its Current PE Ratio?

Bryan Cramer

I am writing today to help inform people who are new to the stock market and want to start learning about core concepts of fundamental analysis on practical examples from today’s market.

Thai Beverage Public Company Limited (SGX:Y92) is trading with a trailing P/E of 18.6x, which is lower than the industry average of 23.8x. While this makes Y92 appear like a great stock to buy, you might change your mind after I explain the assumptions behind the P/E ratio. In this article, I will deconstruct the P/E ratio and highlight what you need to be careful of when using the P/E ratio.

Check out our latest analysis for Thai Beverage

Demystifying the P/E ratio

SGX:Y92 PE PEG Gauge September 5th 18

The P/E ratio is one of many ratios used in relative valuation. By comparing a stock’s price per share to its earnings per share, we are able to see how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company’s earnings.

P/E Calculation for Y92

Price-Earnings Ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share

Y92 Price-Earnings Ratio = THB15.01 ÷ THB0.807 = 18.6x

The P/E ratio isn’t a metric you view in isolation and only becomes useful when you compare it against other similar companies. Our goal is to compare the stock’s P/E ratio to the average of companies that have similar attributes to Y92, such as company lifetime and products sold. A common peer group is companies that exist in the same industry, which is what I use. Since Y92’s P/E of 18.6 is lower than its industry peers (23.8), it means that investors are paying less for each dollar of Y92’s earnings. Since the sector in is relatively small, I’ve included similar companies in the wider region in order to get a better idea of the multiple, which is a median of profitable companies of companies such as , and . One could put it like this: the market is pricing Y92 as if it is a weaker company than the average company in its industry.

Assumptions to watch out for

However, it is important to note that this conclusion is based on two key assumptions. The first is that our “similar companies” are actually similar to Y92, or else the difference in P/E might be a result of other factors. For example, if you compared lower risk firms with Y92, then investors would naturally value it at a lower price since it is a riskier investment. The second assumption that must hold true is that the stocks we are comparing Y92 to are fairly valued by the market. If this does not hold true, Y92’s lower P/E ratio may be because firms in our peer group are overvalued by the market.

What this means for you:

If your personal research into the stock confirms what the P/E ratio is telling you, it might be a good time to add more of Y92 to your portfolio. But keep in mind that the usefulness of relative valuation depends on whether you are comfortable with making the assumptions I mentioned above. Remember that basing your investment decision off one metric alone is certainly not sufficient. There are many things I have not taken into account in this article and the PE ratio is very one-dimensional. If you have not done so already, I highly recommend you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

  1. Future Outlook: What are well-informed industry analysts predicting for Y92’s future growth? Take a look at our free research report of analyst consensus for Y92’s outlook.
  2. Past Track Record: Has Y92 been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of Y92’s historicals for more clarity.
  3. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.