U.S. markets closed
  • S&P 500

    4,411.79
    +44.31 (+1.01%)
     
  • Dow 30

    35,061.55
    +238.20 (+0.68%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    14,836.99
    +152.39 (+1.04%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    2,209.65
    +10.17 (+0.46%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    72.17
    +0.26 (+0.36%)
     
  • Gold

    1,802.10
    -3.30 (-0.18%)
     
  • Silver

    25.24
    -0.14 (-0.56%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.1770
    -0.0003 (-0.02%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.2860
    +0.0210 (+1.66%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3754
    -0.0013 (-0.10%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    110.5100
    +0.3950 (+0.36%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    34,199.15
    -190.85 (-0.55%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    786.33
    -7.40 (-0.93%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,027.58
    +59.28 (+0.85%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    27,548.00
    +159.80 (+0.58%)
     

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of Celestica Inc. (TSE:CLS) Shares?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·5 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Every investor in Celestica Inc. (TSE:CLS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Companies that used to be publicly owned tend to have lower insider ownership.

Celestica isn't enormous, but it's not particularly small either. It has a market capitalization of CA$1.4b, which means it would generally expect to see some institutions on the share registry. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Celestica.

Check out our latest analysis for Celestica

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Celestica?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

Celestica already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Celestica's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Celestica. Onex Corporation is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. Letko, Brosseau & Associates Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 14% of common stock, and Pzena Investment Management, Inc holds about 5.3% of the company stock.

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Celestica

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Celestica Inc.. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CA$14m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, with a 21% stake in the company, will not easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Equity Ownership

With an ownership of 15%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Celestica has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.