U.S. markets closed
  • S&P Futures

    4,693.00
    +8.00 (+0.17%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    35,736.00
    +23.00 (+0.06%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    16,363.75
    +45.75 (+0.28%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    2,257.70
    +3.80 (+0.17%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    71.72
    -0.33 (-0.46%)
     
  • Gold

    1,786.80
    +2.10 (+0.12%)
     
  • Silver

    22.50
    -0.02 (-0.10%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.1283
    +0.0010 (+0.09%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.4800
    +0.0460 (+3.21%)
     
  • Vix

    21.89
    -5.29 (-19.46%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3246
    +0.0004 (+0.03%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    113.4490
    -0.0910 (-0.08%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    50,460.86
    -225.31 (-0.44%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,303.85
    -17.43 (-1.32%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,339.90
    +107.62 (+1.49%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    28,752.52
    +296.92 (+1.04%)
     

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of NovaGold Resources Inc. (TSE:NG) Shares?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4 min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Every investor in NovaGold Resources Inc. (TSE:NG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

With a market capitalization of CA$2.9b, NovaGold Resources is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about NovaGold Resources.

See our latest analysis for NovaGold Resources

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NovaGold Resources?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

NovaGold Resources already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at NovaGold Resources' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.7% of NovaGold Resources. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Electrum Strategic Holdings, L.L.C. is currently the largest shareholder, with 25% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.7% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Gregory Lang is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

Insider Ownership Of NovaGold Resources

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in NovaGold Resources Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth CA$39m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, with a 19% stake in the company, will not easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 27%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - NovaGold Resources has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.