U.S. Markets closed
  • S&P 500

    4,076.60
    +58.83 (+1.46%)
     
  • Dow 30

    34,086.04
    +368.95 (+1.09%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    11,584.55
    +190.74 (+1.67%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    1,931.94
    +46.22 (+2.45%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    79.04
    +1.14 (+1.46%)
     
  • Gold

    1,944.00
    +4.80 (+0.25%)
     
  • Silver

    23.82
    +0.09 (+0.37%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0867
    +0.0011 (+0.0978%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    3.5290
    -0.0220 (-0.62%)
     
  • Vix

    19.40
    -0.54 (-2.71%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2319
    -0.0035 (-0.2846%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    130.0900
    -0.2680 (-0.2056%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    22,915.38
    +175.66 (+0.77%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    519.63
    +0.84 (+0.16%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,771.70
    -13.17 (-0.17%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    27,327.11
    -106.29 (-0.39%)
     

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of Agile Growth Corp. (NASDAQ:AGGR) Shares?

If you want to know who really controls Agile Growth Corp. (NASDAQ:AGGR), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

With a market capitalization of US$377m, Agile Growth is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Agile Growth.

Check out our latest analysis for Agile Growth

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Agile Growth?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

Agile Growth already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Agile Growth, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It would appear that 5.2% of Agile Growth shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Jay Bhatt with 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.2% and 4.5% of the stock.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

Insider Ownership Of Agile Growth

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Agile Growth Corp.. Insiders own US$75m worth of shares in the US$377m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Agile Growth (including 2 which can't be ignored) .

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.