Advertisement
U.S. Markets open in 3 hrs 52 mins
  • S&P Futures

    5,209.00
    -5.75 (-0.11%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    39,183.00
    -40.00 (-0.10%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    18,209.75
    -21.75 (-0.12%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    2,042.40
    -7.40 (-0.36%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    82.52
    -0.20 (-0.24%)
     
  • Gold

    2,154.60
    -9.70 (-0.45%)
     
  • Silver

    25.08
    -0.19 (-0.75%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0848
    -0.0028 (-0.2604%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3400
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     
  • Vix

    14.52
    +0.19 (+1.33%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2679
    -0.0050 (-0.3892%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    150.5640
    +1.4660 (+0.9832%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    63,825.32
    -4,322.90 (-6.34%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    885.54
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,718.26
    -4.29 (-0.06%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    40,003.60
    +263.20 (+0.66%)
     

China says U.S. trying to force it to submit on trade as new tariffs kick in

FILE PHOTO: Shipping containers are seen at a port in Shanghai, China July 10, 2018. REUTERS/Aly Song/File Photo (Reuters)

By Se Young Lee and Min Zhang BEIJING (Reuters) - The United States and China imposed fresh tariffs on each other's goods on Monday as the world's biggest economies showed no signs of backing down from an increasingly bitter trade dispute that is expected to hit global economic growth. Soon after the new duties went into effect, China accused the United States of engaging in "trade bullyism" and said it was intimidating other countries to submit to its will, the official Xinhua news agency said, reiterating China's willingness to fight if necessary. But Beijing also said it was willing to restart trade negotiations with the United States if the talks are "based on mutual respect and equality," Xinhua said, citing a white paper on the dispute published by China's State Council. U.S. tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods and retaliatory tariffs by Beijing on $60 billion worth of U.S. products took effect at midday Asian time, though the initial level of the duties was not as high as earlier feared. Stocks on Wall Street closed lower. Boeing Co, the biggest U.S. exporter to China, dropped 1.1 percent and Caterpillar Inc 1.5 percent on the New York Stock Exchange. Network equipment maker Cisco also fell. "One of the bigger risks with these tariffs going into effect is that the United States may be pushed out of the Chinese market, and it is a growing market," said Scott Brown, chief economist at Raymond James in St. Petersburg, Florida. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 181.45 points, or 0.68 percent, to 26,562.095, and the S&P 500 finished 10.30 points lower, or 0.35 percent, to 2,919.37, but the Nasdaq Composite rose 6.29 points, or 0.08 percent, to 7,993.25. Moody's said on Monday additional U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports are negative for various sectors in both countries and could spread beyond targeted sectors, adding that tariffs are credit negative for U.S. furniture & home goods retailers, with more than half their imports coming from china last year. The United States will levy tariffs of 10 percent initially, rising to 25 percent at the end of 2018. Beijing has imposed rates of 5 percent to 10 percent and warned it would respond to any rise in U.S. tariffs on Chinese products accordingly. The two sides had already slapped tariffs on $50 billion worth of each other's goods. For U.S. consumers, the new duties could translate into higher prices for Chinese products ranging from vacuum cleaners to technology gear such as home modems and routers, while U.S. goods targeted by Beijing include liquefied natural gas and certain types of aircraft. President Donald Trump is pressing China to reduce its huge bilateral trade surplus and make sweeping changes to its policies on trade, technology transfers and high-tech industrial subsidies. Beijing has denied that U.S. companies are forced to transfer technology and sees Washington's demands on rolling back its industrial policies as an attempt to contain China's economic rise. The U.S. administration "has brazenly preached unilateralism, protectionism and economic hegemony, making false accusations against many countries and regions, particularly China, intimidating other countries through economic measures such as imposing tariffs," Xinhua quoted the State Council's white paper as saying. "NO END IN SIGHT FOR TRADE WAR" Several rounds of Sino-U.S. trade talks in recent months have yielded no major breakthroughs, and attempts at arranging another meeting in coming weeks have fallen through. A senior White House official said last week the United States will continue to engage China, but added there was no date for further talks. China, which has accused Washington of being insincere in the negotiations, has decided not to send Vice Premier Liu He to Washington this week, the Wall Street Journal reported late last week. News of Beijing's decision to skip the talks pushed China's yuan currency down 0.3 percent on Monday in offshore trade, reinforcing investors' fears that both sides are digging in for a long fight. Mainland China markets were closed for a holiday. Economists warn that a protracted dispute will eventually stunt growth across the globe. Companies on both sides of the Pacific are already reporting disruptions to their operations and are reviewing investment plans. The trade tensions have also cast a pall over broader relations between Beijing and Washington, with the two sides butting heads on a growing number of issues. China summoned the U.S. ambassador in Beijing and postponed military talks in protest against a U.S. decision to sanction a Chinese military agency and its director for buying Russian fighter jets and a missile system. Rob Carnell, ING's chief Asia economist, said in a note to clients that in the absence of any incentives Beijing would likely hold off on any further negotiations for now. "It would look weak both to the U.S. and at home," he said, adding that there is "sufficient stimulus in the pipeline" to limit the damage of the latest tariffs on China's economy. "The U.S.-China trade war has no clear end in sight." China may also be waiting for U.S. midterm congressional elections early next month for any hints of changes in Washington's policy stance, Carnell added. "With generic polls favouring the Democrats, they may feel that the trade environment will be less hostile after November 6." The China Daily, Beijing's official English newspaper, paid for a four-page advertising supplement on Sunday in the Des Moines Register - the largest newspaper in the politically important state of Iowa. The insert, which called the trade war the "fruit of a president's folly," highlighted the dispute's impact on a slew of U.S. agricultural sectors, including soybean farmers, pecan nut growers and seafood exporters. Iowa's corn, soybean and hog sectors will lose between $1.68 billion and $2.2 billion in revenues because of the trade fights, according to a recent study by Iowa State University. The state is the top U.S. producer of corn and pork, and a leading producer of soybeans, eggs and poultry. Trump earlier this month accused China of targeting rural voters who support his presidency by hitting agricultural goods. Beijing has repeatedly denied the charge. WASHINGTON READYING MORE MEASURES Trump on Saturday reiterated a threat to impose further tariffs on Chinese goods should Beijing retaliate, suggesting that Washington may slap tariffs on virtually all imported Chinese goods if the administration does not get its way. China imports far less from the United States, making a dollar-for-dollar match on any new U.S. tariffs impossible. Instead, it has warned of "qualitative" measures to retaliate. Though Beijing has not revealed what such steps might be, business executives and analysts say it could withhold exports of certain products to the United States or create more administrative red tape for American companies operating in China. Some analysts say there is also a risk that China could allow its currency to weaken again to cushion the blow to its exporters. (Reporting by Se Young Lee, Min Zhang and Yilei Sun; Additional reporting by David Lawder in WASHINGTON, and P.J. Huffstutter in Chicago; Editing by Kim Coghill, Nick Zieminski and Jonathan Oatis)

Advertisement