U.S. Markets close in 1 hr 4 mins

U.S. Supreme Court Declines Review of Massachusetts First Marblehead Corp. Decision

DALLAS, Feb. 23, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- The U.S. Supreme Court denied the request to review the apportionment decision in First Marblehead Corp. v. Massachusetts Commissioner of Revenue.1 In First Marblehead, the issue is whether Massachusetts could source student loans to Massachusetts under financial excise tax apportionment provisions when the taxpayer had its commercial domicile in Massachusetts, with no other physical location. In 2015, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court had ruled against the taxpayer,2 and after Supreme Court review of this decision, the case was remanded to Massachusetts to be reviewed under the decision rendered in Wynne.3

In Wynne, the Court examined the "internal consistency" test under the dormant commerce clause. Under Massachusetts law, if a loan is assigned by the taxpayer to a place outside the Commonwealth that is not a "regular place of business," the statute creates a presumption, rebuttable by the taxpayer, that the loan is properly assigned to the Commonwealth if, at the time the loan is  made, the taxpayer's commercial domicile was in Massachusetts. The 2016 decision held that this provision did not violate the internal consistency test as defined by Wynne. First Marblehead had again petitioned the Court to examine the 2016 decision and answer the following: 1) whether the application of the Massachusetts apportionment formula passes the "external consistency" test as to a fair relationship to the activities undertaken in the taxing state, and 2) whether the Massachusetts statute fails the "internal consistency" test, as double taxation could exist if the taxpayer were to source property to other states in which it did not have a regular place of business.

A review of this case would have given the Court the opportunity to determine if the Massachusetts court correctly interpreted and applied the Wynne decision.

1 First Marblehead Corp. v. Massachusetts Commissioner of Revenue, No. SJC-11609 (Mass. Jan. 28, 2015).
2 First Marblehead Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue, 470 Mass. 497, 498 (2015).
3 Comptroller of the Treasury of Md. v. Wynne, 135 S. Ct. 1787 (2015).

About Ryan
Ryan is an award-winning global tax services firm, with the largest indirect and property tax practices in North America and the seventh largest corporate tax practice in the United States. With global headquarters in Dallas, Texas, the Firm provides a comprehensive range of state, local, federal, and international tax advisory and consulting services on a multi-jurisdictional basis, including audit defense, tax recovery, credits and incentives, tax process improvement and automation, tax appeals, tax compliance, and strategic planning. Ryan is a five-time recipient of the International Service Excellence Award from the Customer Service Institute of America (CSIA) for its commitment to world-class client service. Empowered by the dynamic myRyan work environment, which is widely recognized as the most innovative in the tax services industry, Ryan's multi-disciplinary team of more than 2,100 professionals and associates serves over 12,000 clients in more than 40 countries, including many of the world's most prominent Global 5000 companies. More information about Ryan can be found at ryan.com.

TECHNICAL INFORMATION CONTACTS:

Mark Nachbar
Principal
Ryan
630.515.0477
mark.nachbar@ryan.com

Mary Bernard
Director
Ryan
401.272.3363
mary.bernard@ryan.com

 

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/us-supreme-court-declines-review-of-massachusetts-first-marblehead-corp-decision-300412911.html