Advertisement
U.S. markets closed
  • S&P 500

    5,254.35
    +5.86 (+0.11%)
     
  • Dow 30

    39,807.37
    +47.29 (+0.12%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,379.46
    -20.06 (-0.12%)
     
  • Russell 2000

    2,124.55
    +10.20 (+0.48%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.11
    -0.06 (-0.07%)
     
  • Gold

    2,254.80
    +16.40 (+0.73%)
     
  • Silver

    25.10
    +0.18 (+0.74%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0779
    -0.0014 (-0.13%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2060
    +0.0100 (+0.24%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2623
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    151.4000
    +0.0280 (+0.02%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    70,457.01
    +236.18 (+0.34%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    885.54
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,952.62
    +20.64 (+0.26%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    40,369.44
    +201.37 (+0.50%)
     

Watertown arena deficits compared to golf course's projected operations

Feb. 22—WATERTOWN — The Watertown Municipal Arena has continued to lose money ever since the renovated facility re-opened in 2016, with an operating loss that exceeded $450,000 last year.

City Comptroller James E. Mills acknowledged that the arena — home of hockey organizations, concerts and figure skating shows — will never make money.

In the past seven years, the city ice rink has lost more than $2.4 million.

That doesn't include the annual debt that the city pays on the cost of renovating the ice rink, City Councilwoman Lisa A. Ruggiero pointed out.

Last year, the city paid $600,000 on the 25-year bond it owes, she said. With the operating losses, that totals about $1 million for the year.

The city also uses its occupancy hotel tax that it gets every year to help pay down on the arena's debt. Since 2017, the city has applied $1.3 million of its bed tax money to pay toward the facility's debt.

After a series of costly change orders, the arena renovations ended up costing $10.8 million, with the city still owing about $8 million on the project. At Tuesday's City Council meeting, Councilwoman Ruggiero brought up the amount of money that the arena loses to make a point about the recent purchase of the Watertown Golf Club for $3.4 million from owner Michael E. Lundy.

With the negative publicity surrounding the purchase golf course, Councilwoman Ruggiero thought "it was interesting to point out" how much the arena has been in the black since its opening seven years ago.

She's been criticized for voting for the golf club purchase because of its cost.

In comparing the $1 million deficit for the arena, the golf course is projected to be $286,000 in the hole for the first two seasons that the city will run it.

"That's probably three times the amount of the golf course," she said.

The arena deficit also will be about twice as much than it's going to cost to run the golf course and operate three pools in the city, she added.

While she believes that the arena was a worthwhile project that provides popular programs for city residents, she said it often costs money to offer those kinds of amenities to city residents.

Councilman Cliff G. Olney, who also supported the golf club deal, said he was glad that Councilwoman Ruggiero raised the issue.

"It's not only about dollars and cents," he said, adding "it's about return of investment."

He contended that City Council has a responsibility to invest in projects that improve the quality of life of city residents.

The purchase of the golf club will do that, he said.

But Mayor Jeffrey M. Smith, who opposed the deal, said that the arena and the golf club purchase have a big difference.

The arena wasn't projected to be a money maker, like the golf club has been, he said

"They knew going into it was going to lose money, but it was the matter of how much," he said, while supporters of the golf club boasted that the golf club was a profitable business that would make money for the city.

He also pointed out that the arena is a year-around facility. The golf club is not.

The mayor was not a council member when the arena was rebuilt, but supported the project.

Advertisement