U.S. Markets closed

Why You Should Like Gravity Co., Ltd.’s (NASDAQ:GRVY) ROCE

Simply Wall St

Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a $250 gift card!

Today we'll evaluate Gravity Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ:GRVY) to determine whether it could have potential as an investment idea. In particular, we'll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), as that can give us insight into how profitably the company is able to employ capital in its business.

Firstly, we'll go over how we calculate ROCE. Then we'll compare its ROCE to similar companies. And finally, we'll look at how its current liabilities are impacting its ROCE.

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What is it?

ROCE measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Generally speaking a higher ROCE is better. Ultimately, it is a useful but imperfect metric. Renowned investment researcher Michael Mauboussin has suggested that a high ROCE can indicate that 'one dollar invested in the company generates value of more than one dollar'.

How Do You Calculate Return On Capital Employed?

The formula for calculating the return on capital employed is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

Or for Gravity:

0.52 = ₩53b ÷ (₩198b - ₩97b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2019.)

Therefore, Gravity has an ROCE of 52%.

See our latest analysis for Gravity

Is Gravity's ROCE Good?

ROCE can be useful when making comparisons, such as between similar companies. Gravity's ROCE appears to be substantially greater than the 9.1% average in the Entertainment industry. I think that's good to see, since it implies the company is better than other companies at making the most of its capital. Regardless of the industry comparison, in absolute terms, Gravity's ROCE currently appears to be excellent.

Gravity has an ROCE of 52%, but it didn't have an ROCE 3 years ago, since it was unprofitable. That suggests the business has returned to profitability. You can see in the image below how Gravity's ROCE compares to its industry. Click to see more on past growth.

NasdaqGM:GRVY Past Revenue and Net Income, July 17th 2019

It is important to remember that ROCE shows past performance, and is not necessarily predictive. ROCE can be deceptive for cyclical businesses, as returns can look incredible in boom times, and terribly low in downturns. ROCE is only a point-in-time measure. How cyclical is Gravity? You can see for yourself by looking at this free graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

What Are Current Liabilities, And How Do They Affect Gravity's ROCE?

Current liabilities include invoices, such as supplier payments, short-term debt, or a tax bill, that need to be paid within 12 months. The ROCE equation subtracts current liabilities from capital employed, so a company with a lot of current liabilities appears to have less capital employed, and a higher ROCE than otherwise. To check the impact of this, we calculate if a company has high current liabilities relative to its total assets.

Gravity has total liabilities of ₩97b and total assets of ₩198b. As a result, its current liabilities are equal to approximately 49% of its total assets. Gravity has a medium level of current liabilities, boosting its ROCE somewhat.

Our Take On Gravity's ROCE

Despite this, it reports a high ROCE, and may be worth investigating further. There might be better investments than Gravity out there, but you will have to work hard to find them . These promising businesses with rapidly growing earnings might be right up your alley.

I will like Gravity better if I see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of growing companies with considerable, recent, insider buying.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.