U.S. Markets close in 40 mins

Why You Need To Look At This Factor Before Buying Gulf Resources Inc (NASDAQ:GURE)

Sadie Atkinson

For Gulf Resources Inc’s (NASDAQ:GURE) shareholders, and also potential investors in the stock, understanding how the stock’s risk and return characteristics can impact your portfolio is important. The beta measures GURE’s exposure to the wider market risk, which reflects changes in economic and political factors. Not all stocks are expose to the same level of market risk, and the market as a whole represents a beta value of one. A stock with a beta greater than one is expected to exhibit higher volatility resulting from market-wide shocks compared to one with a beta below one.

View our latest analysis for Gulf Resources

What does GURE’s beta value mean?

Gulf Resources’s beta of 0.62 indicates that the stock value will be less variable compared to the whole stock market. This means the stock is more defensive against the ups and downs of a stock market, moving by less than the entire market index in times of change. Based on this beta value, GURE appears to be a stock that an investor with a high-beta portfolio would look for to reduce risk exposure to the market.

Could GURE’s size and industry cause it to be more volatile?

GURE, with its market capitalisation of US$65.53M, is a small-cap stock, which generally have higher beta than similar companies of larger size. Furthermore, the company operates in the chemicals industry, which has been found to have high sensitivity to market-wide shocks. As a result, we should expect a high beta for the small-cap GURE but a low beta for the chemicals industry. It seems as though there is an inconsistency in risks portrayed by GURE’s size and industry relative to its actual beta value. A potential driver of this variance can be a fundamental factor, which we will take a look at next.

NasdaqGS:GURE Income Statement May 17th 18

How GURE’s assets could affect its beta

An asset-heavy company tends to have a higher beta because the risk associated with running fixed assets during a downturn is highly expensive. I examine GURE’s ratio of fixed assets to total assets to see whether the company is highly exposed to the risk of this type of constraint. Considering fixed assets account for less than a third of the company’s overall assets, GURE seems to have a smaller dependency on fixed costs to generate revenue. As a result, the company may be less volatile relative to broad market movements, compared to a company of similar size but higher proportion of fixed assets. This is consistent with is current beta value which also indicates low volatility.

What this means for you:

You may reap the benefit of muted movements during times of economic decline by holding onto GURE. Its low fixed cost also means that, in terms of operating leverage, its costs are relatively malleable to preserve margins. What I have not mentioned in my article here are important company-specific fundamentals such as Gulf Resources’s financial health and performance track record. I urge you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

  1. Financial Health: Is GURE’s operations financially sustainable? Balance sheets can be hard to analyze, which is why we’ve done it for you. Check out our financial health checks here.
  2. Past Track Record: Has GURE been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of GURE’s historicals for more clarity.
  3. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.