U.S. Markets open in 49 mins

Why You Should Like Most Kwai Chung Limited’s (HKG:1716) ROCE

Matthew Smith

Today we’ll evaluate Most Kwai Chung Limited (HKG:1716) to determine whether it could have potential as an investment idea. To be precise, we’ll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), as that will inform our view of the quality of the business.

First of all, we’ll work out how to calculate ROCE. Then we’ll compare its ROCE to similar companies. And finally, we’ll look at how its current liabilities are impacting its ROCE.

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What is it?

ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. Generally speaking a higher ROCE is better. Overall, it is a valuable metric that has its flaws. Author Edwin Whiting says to be careful when comparing the ROCE of different businesses, since ‘No two businesses are exactly alike.’

So, How Do We Calculate ROCE?

Analysts use this formula to calculate return on capital employed:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

Or for Most Kwai Chung:

0.25 = HK$28m ÷ (HK$104m – HK$11m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2018.)

Therefore, Most Kwai Chung has an ROCE of 25%.

Check out our latest analysis for Most Kwai Chung

Want to help shape the future of investing tools and platforms? Take the survey and be part of one of the most advanced studies of stock market investors to date.

Does Most Kwai Chung Have A Good ROCE?

When making comparisons between similar businesses, investors may find ROCE useful. In our analysis, Most Kwai Chung’s ROCE is meaningfully higher than the 11% average in the Media industry. I think that’s good to see, since it implies the company is better than other companies at making the most of its capital. Setting aside the comparison to its industry for a moment, Most Kwai Chung’s ROCE in absolute terms currently looks quite high.

As we can see, Most Kwai Chung currently has an ROCE of 25%, less than the 79% it reported 3 years ago. So investors might consider if it has had issues recently.

SEHK:1716 Last Perf January 14th 19

Remember that this metric is backwards looking – it shows what has happened in the past, and does not accurately predict the future. Companies in cyclical industries can be difficult to understand using ROCE, as returns typically look high during boom times, and low during busts. This is because ROCE only looks at one year, instead of considering returns across a whole cycle. How cyclical is Most Kwai Chung? You can see for yourself by looking at this free graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

What Are Current Liabilities, And How Do They Affect Most Kwai Chung’s ROCE?

Liabilities, such as supplier bills and bank overdrafts, are referred to as current liabilities if they need to be paid within 12 months. Due to the way the ROCE equation works, having large bills due in the near term can make it look as though a company has less capital employed, and thus a higher ROCE than usual. To counter this, investors can check if a company has high current liabilities relative to total assets.

Most Kwai Chung has total liabilities of HK$11m and total assets of HK$104m. Therefore its current liabilities are equivalent to approximately 11% of its total assets. This is quite a low level of current liabilities which would not greatly boost the already high ROCE.

Our Take On Most Kwai Chung’s ROCE

This is good to see, and with such a high ROCE, Most Kwai Chung may be worth a closer look. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking at a few good candidates. So take a peek at this free list of companies with modest (or no) debt, trading on a P/E below 20.

For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.