U.S. Markets closed

Who will buy Fox's 22 regional sports networks?

Daniel Roberts

The US Department of Justice on Wednesday granted provisional approval to Disney’s $71.3 billion purchase of 21st Century Fox’s entertainment assets. The news is a win for Disney, though the deal is not done until Fox’s board votes—Comcast (CMCSA) could still make Fox another offer, raising the stakes and forcing Disney (DIS) to pay more.

If Disney ends up the victor, it will get Fox’s (FOX) valuable library of original television, including “Modern Family” and “The Simpsons.” It will get lucrative Fox film franchises like the “X-Men,” “Deadpool,” and “Avatar.” It will get the FX and National Geographic networks. It will get Fox’s ownership stake in the joint venture Hulu, making Disney the majority owner of Hulu.

But it will not, after all, get Fox’s 22 regional sports networks (RSNs).

The DOJ, in its approval, gave one condition, by filing a civil antitrust lawsuit to block the acquisition and at the same time filing a proposed settlement to that lawsuit: Disney must sell off those networks within 90 days of the acquisition. Disney accepted the condition.

“American consumers have benefitted from head-to-head competition between Disney and Fox’s cable sports programming that ultimately has prevented cable television subscription prices from rising even higher,” DOJ official Makan Delrahim said in the DOJ’s press release, which continued, “Without the required divestitures, the proposed acquisition would likely result in higher prices for cable sports programming licensed to multichannel video programming distributors (“MVPDs”) in each of the local markets that the RSNs serve.”

Much had been written about all the things that Disney could do with those regional sports networks, and how they might boost the ESPN ecosystem.

Nevermind. The DOJ thinks that owning the RSNs, when it already has ESPN, would give Disney unfair pricing power. Now the question becomes: Who will buy the RSNs?

A reporter goes on air for YES Network before the Los Angeles Lakers played the Brooklyn Nets in Los Angeles on Nov. 20, 2012. (REUTERS/Danny Moloshok)

Fox’s 22 regional sports networks are spread across the country, but concentrated in the Midwest: Fox Sports Kansas City, Fox Sports Oklahoma, SportsTime Ohio, and Fox Sports Midwest are among them. They show live games of more than 44 MLB, NBA, and NHL teams (no NFL) and produce more than 5,500 live games per year.

The best-known of the portfolio, arguably the crown jewel, is YES Network, which is jointly owned by Fox and the New York Yankees and broadcasts the games of the Yankees and the Brooklyn Nets.

The Yankees could simply buy back YES from Fox, an option the team has already been considering even before the DOJ condition to Disney.

Map of Fox RSNs (DOJ filing/Ars Technica)

As for the rest, Comcast is an obvious possibility. Acquiring 21 regional sports networks could be something of a consolation prize after missing out on the larger prize of the other Fox assets. And Comcast would make sense as a buyer: it already owns a portfolio of RSNs, originally with names beginning with Comcast SportsNet, and this year it rebranded them all under the NBC Sports name. Comcast knows what to do with RSNs. Disney and ESPN do not own any.

Or Charter Communications (CHTR) could buy the networks. John Malone, the cable pioneer who has a significant stake in Charter, specifically said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal this month that Charter has an interest in buying regional sports networks.

Or Discovery Communications, which owns Discovery Channel, Animal Planet, TLC and others, could be interested. In March, Discovery closed its $14.6 billion acquisition of Scripps Networks, which owns HGTV and Food Network. On the other hand, Discovery doesn’t have much experience with sports television, other than a 20% stake in European sports broadcaster Eurosport.

The question mark around the 22 RSNs certainly adds a new wrinkle to the larger Fox-Disney-Comcast bidding war. The Kansas City Star, for one example, has already alerted its readers in a headline: “FSKC’s future is now in question.” And 21 other sports markets will be monitoring the situation more closely now because of the uncertain future of their hometown networks.

Daniel Roberts is the sports business writer at Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Twitter at @readDanwrite

Read more:

ESPN is rethinking SportsCenter for the smartphone age

British media group Perform spends $1 billion to stream boxing in the US

ESPN’s new streaming service is aimed at a very specific sports fan

Amazon Prime, YouTube TV are in a sports streaming race

How MLB’s video arm got so big that Disney had to buy it