U.S. Markets open in 6 hrs 19 mins

Should We Worry About Vicat SA’s (EPA:VCT) P/E Ratio?

Liz Campbell

This article is written for those who want to get better at using price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). To keep it practical, we’ll show how Vicat SA’s (EPA:VCT) P/E ratio could help you assess the value on offer. Vicat has a price to earnings ratio of 11.67, based on the last twelve months. That means that at current prices, buyers pay €11.67 for every €1 in trailing yearly profits.

Check out our latest analysis for Vicat

How Do You Calculate A P/E Ratio?

The formula for price to earnings is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Price per Share ÷ Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for Vicat:

P/E of 11.67 = €41.9 ÷ €3.59 (Based on the year to June 2018.)

Is A High Price-to-Earnings Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio implies that investors pay a higher price for the earning power of the business. That isn’t necessarily good or bad, but a high P/E implies relatively high expectations of what a company can achieve in the future.

How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

P/E ratios primarily reflect market expectations around earnings growth rates. Earnings growth means that in the future the ‘E’ will be higher. Therefore, even if you pay a high multiple of earnings now, that multiple will become lower in the future. A lower P/E should indicate the stock is cheap relative to others — and that may attract buyers.

Vicat increased earnings per share by an impressive 23% over the last twelve months. And it has bolstered its earnings per share by 4.5% per year over the last five years. With that performance, you might expect an above average P/E ratio.

How Does Vicat’s P/E Ratio Compare To Its Peers?

The P/E ratio indicates whether the market has higher or lower expectations of a company. As you can see below, Vicat has a higher P/E than the average company (9.9) in the basic materials industry.

ENXTPA:VCT PE PEG Gauge December 24th 18

Its relatively high P/E ratio indicates that Vicat shareholders think it will perform better than other companies in its industry classification. Clearly the market expects growth, but it isn’t guaranteed. So investors should always consider the P/E ratio alongside other factors, such as whether company directors have been buying shares.

Don’t Forget: The P/E Does Not Account For Debt or Bank Deposits

The ‘Price’ in P/E reflects the market capitalization of the company. Thus, the metric does not reflect cash or debt held by the company. Theoretically, a business can improve its earnings (and produce a lower P/E in the future), by taking on debt (or spending its remaining cash).

Spending on growth might be good or bad a few years later, but the point is that the P/E ratio does not account for the option (or lack thereof).

Is Debt Impacting Vicat’s P/E?

Vicat’s net debt is 49% of its market cap. If you want to compare its P/E ratio to other companies, you should absolutely keep in mind it has significant borrowings.

The Verdict On Vicat’s P/E Ratio

Vicat trades on a P/E ratio of 11.7, which is below the FR market average of 13.8. The EPS growth last year was strong, and debt levels are quite reasonable. If it continues to grow, then the current low P/E may prove to be unjustified.

Investors should be looking to buy stocks that the market is wrong about. As value investor Benjamin Graham famously said, ‘In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.’ So this free report on the analyst consensus forecasts could help you make a master move on this stock.

You might be able to find a better buy than Vicat. If you want a selection of possible winners, check out this free list of interesting companies that trade on a P/E below 20 (but have proven they can grow earnings).

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.