U.S. Markets open in 8 hrs 6 mins

New York Times corrects editorial that drew huge backlash for blaming Sarah Palin in Gabby Giffords' shooting

Maxwell Tani
Gabby Giffords

(Former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) blows a kiss after reciting the Pledge of Allegiance during the final session of the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina September 6, 2012. REUTERS/Eric Thayer)
The New York Times corrected an editorial on Thursday that suggested the man who shot Rep. Gabby Giffords was inspired by an ad former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's political action committee sent putting a target on Giffords' district.

In its broad attempt to condemn the dangers of heated political rhetoric following another shooting on Wednesday that wounded six people, including a congressman, the New York Times Editorial Board waded into controversy by mistakenly insinuating Jared Lee Loughner shot Giffords for political reasons.

"An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that a link existed between political incitement and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords," the Times wrote on Thursday. "In fact, no such link was established."

Loughner's motivation was much less overtly political than many initially suspected.

The shooter, who plead guilty to the shooting in 2012, had a long history of mental illness which cast doubt over his supposed political radicalization.

Wednesday's editorial sparked an enormous backlash on the right, which noted the factual inconsistency.

In a post on Facebook, Palin described the editorial as "sickening."

"Despite commenting as graciously as I could on media coverage of yesterday's shooting, alas, today a perversely biased media's knee-jerk blame game is attempting to destroy innocent people with lies and more fake news," Palin wrote.

NOW WATCH: 'Our democracy is at risk': Watch Rep. Al Green call for Trump's impeachment



More From Business Insider