New York Times public editor Liz Spayd on Tuesday morning walked back remarks she made last week in which she suggested certain Times journalists should have been disciplined for what she characterized as "outrageous" tweets critical of President-elect Donald Trump.
"In retrospect, I should have held back more, not knowing what the context was for the tweets," Spayd told Politico. "I think that's a fair criticism."
"But I stand by my view that journalists should be careful, sometimes more careful than they are, with what they say on social media," she added. "That includes how it can be interpreted."
Spayd on Friday night told Fox News host Tucker Carlson that some Times journalists went "over the line" with their commentary and criticism of Trump on Twitter.
"I do think that when people go over the line like that, and I think some of those are over the line, that there ought to be some kind of consequence for that," she said.
The comments inflamed reporters from dozens of publications. Many Twitter users skewered Spayd's remarks, with some even calling for her to submit her resignation. One of the Times reporters whose tweets she criticized even addressed the controversy, saying on Twitter he "called it as I saw it."
More From Business Insider
- NY TIMES PUBLIC EDITOR: Some tweets from our politics reporters 'outrageous' and there 'ought to be some kind of consequence'
- Hand-counting ballots looks like a ton of work — here's how the presidential election recount is unfolding in Wisconsin
- TRUMP: 'I would have far less reason to tweet' if the media covered me 'honorably'