|Bid||65.37 x N/A|
|Ask||65.39 x N/A|
|Day's Range||62.78 - 66.00|
|52 Week Range||54.39 - 124.70|
|Beta (5Y Monthly)||0.51|
|PE Ratio (TTM)||54.22|
|Earnings Date||Oct 25, 2021 - Oct 29, 2021|
|Forward Dividend & Yield||0.33 (0.56%)|
|Ex-Dividend Date||Apr 20, 2021|
|1y Target Est||N/A|
Rating Action: Moody's affirms SF's A3 ratings on proposed Kerry acquisition, outlook remains negativeGlobal Credit Research - 11 Feb 2021Hong Kong, February 11, 2021 -- Moody's Investors Service has affirmed S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.'s (SF) A3 issuer rating and the A3 backed senior unsecured rating on the bond of SF Holding Investment Limited that is guaranteed by S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.The ratings outlook remain negative.The rating action follows SF's announcement on February 9 of a tender offer to acquire 51.8% stake in Kerry Logistics Network Limited for a total consideration of HKD17.56 billion, or RMB15 billion in equivalent. Moody's expects SF's total revenue will continue to grow between 15%- 20% per annum over the coming 12-18 months to more than RMB170 billion, and for its reported operating margin to stabilize around 5.0%-5.5%.
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Vipshop Holdings Limited (Vipshop) Baa1 issuer rating. "The affirmation of the rating reflects Vipshop's ability to maintain a strong credit profile, despite coronavirus disruptions and ongoing competition in the online retail market," says Lina Choi, a Moody's Senior Vice President. "We expect Vipshop will maintain its solid financial profile, with low leverage and solid net cash position in the next 12-18 months," adds Choi, who is Moody's Lead Analyst for Vipshop.
Announcement of Periodic Review: Moody's announces completion of a periodic review of ratings of S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. Hong Kong, December 08, 2020 -- Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") has completed a periodic review of the ratings of S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. and other ratings that are associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted through a portfolio review in which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating profile to similarly rated peers.