U.S. Markets close in 5 hrs 54 mins

Nissin Foods Company Limited (1475.HK)

HKSE - HKSE Delayed Price. Currency in HKD
6.0000.000 (0.00%)
At close: 04:08PM HKT
Full screen
Gain actionable insight from technical analysis on financial instruments, to help optimize your trading strategies
Chart Events
Neutralpattern detected
Previous Close6.000
Bid5.980 x 0
Ask6.000 x 0
Day's Range5.970 - 6.030
52 Week Range5.700 - 7.090
Avg. Volume341,062
Market Cap6.262B
Beta (5Y Monthly)0.18
PE Ratio (TTM)19.35
EPS (TTM)0.310
Earnings DateNov 08, 2023 - Nov 13, 2023
Forward Dividend & Yield0.15 (2.53%)
Ex-Dividend DateJun 14, 2023
1y Target Est7.10
Fair Value is the appropriate price for the shares of a company, based on its earnings and growth rate also interpreted as when P/E Ratio = Growth Rate. Estimated return represents the projected annual return you might expect after purchasing shares in the company and holding them over the default time horizon of 5 years, based on the EPS growth rate that we have projected.
Fair Value

Subscribe to Yahoo Finance Plus to view Fair Value for 1475.HK

View details
Research that delivers an independent perspective, consistent methodology and actionable insight
Related Research
    View more
    • Reuters

      Column: Judge in Oracle case clarifies 'odor of denigrating' women comment, praises lawyers

      May 24 (Reuters) - (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) In an extraordinary letter docketed on Tuesday, a Delaware judge said he did not intend to accuse plaintiffs lawyers of sexism when he said that one of their theories in long-running litigation against Oracle Corp founder Larry Ellison and CEO Safra Catz “had some odor of denigrating the abilities of women executives to succeed based on their merits.” “I have, I fear, done plaintiffs’ counsel a disservice,” wrote Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock of Delaware Chancery Court in Tuesday’s letter. Glasscock’s letter addressed a footnote in his May 12 decision clearing Ellison and Catz of breaching their duties to shareholders.

    • Reuters

      CORRECTED-Column: Lawyers suing Oracle draw judge's reproach for arguments with 'odor of denigrating' women

      (Reuters) - (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) A Delaware judge delivered a gut-punch to plaintiffs lawyers when he sided on Friday with Oracle Corp founder Larry Ellison and co-CEO Safra Catz in a long-running case accusing them of overpaying for NetSuite Inc to score a big payday for Ellison. But that wasn’t the only blow: The judge also took a swipe at law firms Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd and Friedlander & Gorris for theorizing that Oracle board member Renee James, a onetime president at Intel Corp who chaired the special board committee that negotiated the $9.3 billion deal to acquire NetSuite in 2016, was not independent because she needed Ellison’s help to advance her career. That theory, wrote Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock of the Delaware Chancery Court, was not just “strongly disproved” by the evidence at trial but also seemed to have a misogynistic subtext.

    • AP Finance

      Judge sides with Ellison in Oracle shareholder suit over NetSuite acquisition

      A Delaware judge has ruled in favor of Oracle founder Larry Ellison in a shareholder lawsuit alleging that he coerced the technology company’s board into paying a grossly inflated price to acquire software company NetSuite Corp. in 2016. Vice Chancellor Samuel Glasscock III on Friday rejected the plaintiffs’ allegation that Oracle’s acquisition was not entitled to the deference traditionally shown corporate decision-makers under Delaware’s “business judgment” rule. The shareholders argued that the $9.3 billion deal should be subjected to a more rigorous “entire fairness” review because Ellison was both a controlling shareholder of Oracle at the time and owned almost 40% of shares in NetSuite, which he cofounded in 1998.