U.S. markets close in 11 minutes

Airborne Wireless Network (ABWN)

Other OTC - Other OTC Delayed Price. Currency in USD
Add to watchlist
0.0006+0.0002 (+50.00%)
As of 3:34PM EDT. Market open.

Airborne Wireless Network

4115 Guardian Street
Suite C
Simi Valley, CA 93063
United States

Sector(s)Communication Services
IndustryTelecom Services
Full Time Employees8

Key Executives

NameTitlePayExercisedYear Born
Mr. Michael J. WarrenCEO & Director232.07kN/A1952
Mr. J. Edward DanielsPres, Treasurer, Sec. & DirectorN/AN/A1950
Mr. Marius D. de MosVP of Technical Affairs & Devel.185.5kN/A1951
Mr. Jason T. de MosVP of Bus. Devel. & ComplianceN/AN/A1981
Mr. Earle O. OlsonVP of Industry RelationsN/AN/A1959
Amounts are as of December 31, 2018 and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay is salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in USD.


Airborne Wireless Network, a development stage company, focuses on developing, marketing, and licensing a fully-meshed high-speed broadband airborne wireless network by linking aircraft in flight. It focuses on developing Infinitus, a high-speed broadband airborne wireless network that would enable participating aircraft to act as an airborne repeater or router, sending and receiving broadband signals from one aircraft to another. It intends to sell broadband wireless bandwidth to the telecommunications companies and Internet service providers. The company was formerly known as Ample-Tee, Inc. and changed its name to Airborne Wireless Network in May 2016. Airborne Wireless Network was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Simi Valley, California.

Corporate Governance

Airborne Wireless Network’s ISS Governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder Rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while a 10 indicates higher governance risk.