1.9400 0.00 (0.00%)
After hours: 6:15PM EST
|Bid||1.9300 x 900|
|Ask||1.9400 x 34100|
|Day's Range||1.8800 - 2.0500|
|52 Week Range||1.8800 - 14.1500|
|Beta (3Y Monthly)||0.78|
|PE Ratio (TTM)||30.79|
|Earnings Date||Feb 11, 2020 - Feb 17, 2020|
|Forward Dividend & Yield||N/A (N/A)|
|1y Target Est||4.12|
The riskiest oil and gas companies are as unpopular as ever, fund managers say. Third-quarter earnings were a critical time for energy companies’ financial performances, and investors found some of them lacking. While the results weren’t bad across the board, would-be buyers were already worn out by the series of defaults and bankruptcies in the sector that occurred in 2015 and 2016.
It is not uncommon to see companies perform well in the years after insiders buy shares. The flip side of that is that...
Antero Resources' (AR) third-quarter 2019 results are affected by higher operating expenses and lower commodity prices, partially offset by an increase in production volumes.
Antero Resources (AR) delivered earnings and revenue surprises of -88.46% and 18.44%, respectively, for the quarter ended September 2019. Do the numbers hold clues to what lies ahead for the stock?
DENVER , Oct. 29, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Antero Resources Corporation (NYSE: AR) ("Antero," "Antero Resources," or the "Company") today released its third quarter 2019 financial ...
Most investors tend to think that hedge funds and other asset managers are worthless, as they cannot beat even simple index fund portfolios. In fact, most people expect hedge funds to compete with and outperform the bull market that we have witnessed in recent years. However, hedge funds are generally partially hedged and aim at […]
Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") has completed a periodic review of the ratings of Antero Resources Corporation and other ratings that are associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted through a portfolio review in which Moody's assessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating profile to similarly rated peers, which was followed by a rating committee. The rating committee resulted in the ratings being placed under review for downgrade on 21 October 2019 and that review for downgrade has not yet been concluded.
NOTE: On October 22, 2019, the press release was corrected as follows: The last sentence of the first paragraph of the RATINGS RATIONALE section was changed to: Moodys expects that the review may result in a one or two notch downgrade of Anteros ratings. Revised release follows. The Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating was downgraded to SGL-3 from SGL-2.
"These actions are linked to our rating action on Antero Resources Corporation (Antero), which was also placed under review for downgrade on October 21, 2019," said Sajjad Alam, Moody's Senior Analyst.
DENVER , Oct. 16, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Antero Resources (NYSE: AR) ("Antero" or the "Company") announced today that the Company plans to issue its third quarter earnings release on ...
Running an oil and gas company is a well-paying gig, no matter how you look at it. The industry is famed for making company leaders rich, especially in boom times. The CEOs of oil and natural gas businesses based in Denver receive annual compensation worth millions of dollars, ranking them among the top-paid executives in the city.
DENVER, Oct. 8, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Antero Resources Corporation (AR) ("Antero Resources" or the "Company") today announced that Vicky Sutil and Tom Tyree have been appointed to its board of directors (the "Board"), as a Class III director and Class I director, respectively, effective as of October 7, 2019. Ms. Sutil has an extensive background in the oil and gas industry, previously with California Resources Corporation serving as Vice President of Commercial Analysis for CRC Marketing, Inc. from 2014 to 2016. Prior to that, Ms. Sutil worked in a variety of corporate and asset level capacities with Occidental Petroleum both upstream and midstream from 2000 to 2014.
Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") has completed a periodic review of the ratings of Antero Midstream Partners LP and other ratings that are associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted through a portfolio review in which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating profile to similarly rated peers. This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is likely in the near future.
The shakeup within Saudi Arabia’s oil and gas industry has added to bullish sentiment over the past week, but the surprise firing of John Bolton may soon change that
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- To get a sense of how the market feels about the day-to-day drama coming out of WeWork, investors have little choice but to turn to its bonds.After all, the company has no publicly traded shares — and, if the latest twist in its saga is to be believed, that might be the case for longer than anticipated. Executives of WeWork and its largest investor, SoftBank Group Corp., are discussing whether to shelve plans for an initial public offering, people with knowledge of the talks told Bloomberg News. On top of that, the office-rental company may rely on junk bonds for funding for the foreseeable future or even explore a whole-business securitization, a WeWork executive said, according to a person familiar with the matter.Not surprisingly, WeWork’s junk bonds are tumbling. They fell below 100 cents on the dollar on Tuesday for the first time since the company filed to go public last month, with both the number of trades and overall volume reaching the highest in about a month. While a dip below face value doesn’t inherently spell doom, it’s nevertheless a sign that the bad news is starting to take its toll on investors.But here’s the mystery: Who exactly are those investors?We know who holds about 25% of WeWork’s $669 million in high-yield debt due 2025 because Bloomberg aggregates data from the most recent public filings. So, for instance, Lord Abbett & Co. held about $43.8 million as of May 31, or about 6.5%. The second-largest holder is Allianz SE, which includes funds from Pacific Investment Management Co.; grouped together, it owns about $21 million, or a bit more than 3%. Three State Street Corp. exchange-traded funds hold a combined $9.6 million, or 1.44%. In the period through July 31, funds from TIAA-CREF and Ameriprise Financial Inc. pared back their exposure. Still, that’s far from a complete picture. Only knowing who owns 25% of a company’s bonds is minuscule, even for the high-yield market. WeWork makes up about 0.05% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Index. Here’s a sampling of other debt with nearly identical weightings and comparable maturities, and how much of its ownership is public:Lamar Media Corp. bond maturing in 2026: 47% known Seven Generations Energy bond maturing in 2025: 72% known J2 Global bond maturing in 2025: 51% known Navient Corp. bond maturing in 2021: 57% known Antero Resources Corp. bond maturing in 2023: 67% known CVR Partners LP bond maturing in 2023: 64% knownSuffice it to say, bonds in the high-yield index with lower publicly reported ownership than WeWork are few and far between. So if active money managers, ETFs, pensions(1) and life insurers make up only a quarter of investors, who else is left? Hedge funds would be a likely place to start looking. WeWork’s bond matures in less than six years and offers a yield of more than 8%. (At the height of the rally last month, it yielded closer to 7%.) The Bloomberg Barclays high-yield index has a comparable average maturity of 5.76 years, but its yield is just 5.6%. There’s been no indication that SoftBank and its affiliates own any of the securities, but they do own about 29% of WeWork stock, which shows just how much the Japanese conglomerate has riding on the company’s success. Opportunistic investors appear to have jumped into WeWork’s bond at least twice this year. The bond soared after the company’s April 29 announcement that it filed paperwork confidentially with the Securities and Exchange Commission to hold an IPO and then again after it filed its S-1 prospectus in August. As I wrote in May, an IPO could give WeWork a cash injection that ought to cover interest for a while. It would also give bondholders a layer of protection in the capital structure because public shareholders would take the biggest hit if WeWork fizzles.These big investors, whoever they may be, can’t be feeling too comfortable right now, given the state of the IPO. As for We Co., the parent of WeWork, becoming a regular presence in the capital markets, I’ll just say this: It’s one thing to be Netflix Inc. — whose stock price has more than doubled since the start of 2017 — and tap the high-yield bond market again and again (its bonds maturing in 2026 have 73.5% public ownership). It’s quite another to be WeWork, given that its IPO range could wind up closer to $20 billion, compared with the $47 billion valuation it had earlier this year. There is no shortage of investors, analysts and commentators who see WeWork as the height of market folly. It’s a company with an unusual corporate structure and a business model that seems destined to implode when the economic cycle turns.So far, the bond market isn’t convinced that WeWork is about to crash and burn. That is, if anyone can trust trading among investors who are largely unknown.(1) The California Public Employees' Retirement System, or Calpers, held about $2.6 million of the bond as of June 30, data compiled by Bloomberg show. It's possible other pension funds don't disclose such precise figures.To contact the author of this story: Brian Chappatta at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editor responsible for this story: Daniel Niemi at email@example.comThis column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Brian Chappatta is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering debt markets. He previously covered bonds for Bloomberg News. He is also a CFA charterholder.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinion©2019 Bloomberg L.P.