Yahoo Finance will soon be upgrading our Conversations message board platform to provide a better experience for our users. Only comments published since April 21, 2021 will be visible on Yahoo Finance after the upgrade. If you wish to download and save any of your older comments, please submit a request via the Privacy Dashboard by no later than Aug. 15, 2022.
As an Avadel share holder I
a)am holding for the long term and don't care about the MMH results but of course would like to see launch sooner rather than later. Not buying or selling just holding for the future.
b)am fearful that Avadel will lose the hearing and the stock will go down so I might still sell before the MMH
c)am confident that Avadel will win the MMH and launch their drug later this year and am going to add more shares at these prices.
d)I am not a share holder. I am short the stock because I believe they will lose both the upcoming MMH and the Administrative hearing next month and the share price will drop lower and I will then cover and profit from their loss.
Lets say LUMRYX does about $1B peak sales(which is only about half of XYREM/XYWAV current revenue run-rate, and only about 1/3 of AVDL's professional research estimated future marketspace opportunity when once-a-night SO therapy creates significant market expansion) and only slap a 4(X)-market multiple, (not HRMY's current 6.8(X))..
You would have a stock that is trading at 10(X) today's price...
I prefer the essentially de-risked future $70+s print tomorrow(meaning a few years out from now).....
So, if Bruce is about to open his purse before MMH, why didn't he do the same before our original PDUFA date of 15th Oct? I mean, if he wants to minimize the price to pay, he has to act before the big event (this time the MMH). But if he does it, why didn't he do it before the PDUFA? He let it happen and it turned out to be a postpone, so he won (some time for his X empire). Following this logic, he won't act until the judge kills patent 963. I'm saying Bruce rather wants to wait how the domino falls, because maybe it will fall in his favor and ready to pay a higher price tag if the event outcome is bad for him, but good for the competitor. I don't expect him to proactively mitigate the risks, instead he acts only when he really needs to.
But again, this is just my opinion and we know that opinions are like...
One thing for sure, if we get bought out soon its not going to be for a measly $7.
What recourse does AVDL have if JAZZ drags it's feet and/or refuses to coordinate their patient databases.
Anybody with experience in this area?
clock is ticking... meanwhile, I am feeling that I have to do my own apology. I have been too optimistic about the FDA in my article :
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4404987-avadel-pharmaceuticals-looking-good-investors-patients-narcolepsy
FDA has been clearly under influence, if not threat from Jazz. I think we'll never know to which level, however, I am convinced that at some point some dirty trick was being used.
31st of August outcome will be key to AVDL future. I Hope that judge Noreika has a clear view of 1) what is at stake 2) This 963 futile patent that shouldn't have never been on our way. In all logics, the outcome shoudl be favorable to AVDL, but I am not sure that logics do have a role in this game where billions of dollars are in play, even in the US where justice is supposed to be independant from the economic power.
We'll see;;;; but in any case AVDL will get its deserved stake in this market, if not this year, in 2023 following patent expiration.
The big sell outs were Avoro 1.6M and Janus 1.4M. Acuta sold their 580k share position.
Decreases of larger holders were:
Polar sold 386k shares - still holds 2.8M
Woodline sold 530k shares -still holds 1.6M
So that is where any selling pressure came from on the big dump down.
New positions Pura Vida 789k shares, Two Sigma 468k shares, Millennium 212k shares
Already mentioned Brandes adding 642k shares and #2 largest holder Jeffrey Gendell added 1.4M shares
HRMY as well as TAK.
https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/opinions/21-691.pdf
https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/JazzPharmaceuticalsIncvAvadelCNSPharmaceuticalsLLCDocketNo122cv00?1660703509
If the judge is on the take and rules in Jazz' favor(yes that would be the only reason to side with Jazz) Avadel will get another shot at justice at next month's administrative hearing.
I can not imagine Jazz prevailing on this patent that should not have been on the orange book in the first place!
Let them keep shorting and let's see where they get to cover in 2 weeks.