U.S. Markets closed

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)


NasdaqGS - NasdaqGS Real Time Price. Currency in USD
Add to watchlist
31.84-0.02 (-0.06%)
At close: 4:00PM EDT

31.80 -0.04 (-0.13%)
After hours: 6:44PM EDT

People also watch
ORCLINTCIBMQCOMMSFT
Full screen
Previous Close31.86
Open31.86
Bid31.80 x 700
Ask31.90 x 300
Day's Range31.70 - 32.02
52 Week Range29.12 - 34.60
Volume11,969,229
Avg. Volume21,579,233
Market Cap159.2B
Beta1.40
PE Ratio (TTM)16.16
EPS (TTM)N/A
Earnings DateN/A
Dividend & Yield1.16 (3.64%)
Ex-Dividend Date2017-07-05
1y Target EstN/A
Trade prices are not sourced from all markets
  • Barrons.com9 hours ago

    Arista Sags: Q3 'Uncertainty' Rises with ITC Setback, Says Wells Fargo

    Shares of Arista Networks (ANET), which has been sued by Cisco Systems (CSCO) on multiple counts of patent infringement in the past couple of years, are down $4.71, or 3%, at $152.10, after the International Trade Commission late yesterday said it would uphold a ban on Arista importing products into the U.S., causing Arista to have to employ a work-around with modified product developed in the U.S. Cisco shares are up one penny at $31.87. Arista had sought an “emergency motion” with the ITC for a suspension of an order of “cease and desist,” issued back on May 4th, in what was known as the “ITC 945 Investigation,” after the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office had found two patents of Cisco’s in that case to have been invalid.

  • Extreme Networks Closed the Avaya Deal. Now What?
    Motley Fool9 hours ago

    Extreme Networks Closed the Avaya Deal. Now What?

    The network equipment specialist is building a bigger and more perfect beast, one buyout at a time.

  • Reuters10 hours ago

    Arista loses bid to lift import ban in Cisco battle

    The U.S. International Trade Commission refused to rescind its May 4 ruling that found Arista's switches infringed two Cisco patents and banned Arista from importing the infringing products into the United States. After the ITC released that decision, a different agency, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, said the two Cisco patents are invalid.