CWYCY - China Railway Construction Corporation Limited

Other OTC - Other OTC Delayed Price. Currency in USD
0.00 (0.00%)
At close: 9:42AM EDT
Stock chart is not supported by your current browser
Previous Close10.45
Bid0.00 x 0
Ask0.00 x 0
Day's Range10.45 - 10.45
52 Week Range10.45 - 14.55
Avg. Volume1,014
Market Cap16.896B
Beta (3Y Monthly)0.60
PE Ratio (TTM)5.65
EPS (TTM)1.85
Earnings DateN/A
Forward Dividend & Yield0.30 (2.91%)
Ex-Dividend Date2019-07-19
1y Target EstN/A
Trade prices are not sourced from all markets
  • Reuters

    Chinese firm eyes billions of dollars in Sao Paulo tenders

    CR20, a subsidiary of China Railway Construction Corp (CRCC) is interested in billions of dollars of infrastructure tenders in the Brazilian state of Sao Paulo, the state government said on Wednesday. Among the projects the firm is eyeing is a new metro line in the city of Sao Paulo, as well as intercity rail links and a project to clean up the heavily polluted Pinheiros River. "Within our company, we have to capacity to carry out practically all types of infrastructure projects," CR20 Chief Executive Deng Yong said in comments cited in a government statement.

  • Moody's

    China Communications Construction Co. Ltd. -- Moody's - Increased infrastructure investment will boost revenue for most rated Chinese construction companies

    Moody's Investors Service says in a new report that rising investment in China's railways, roadways and urban rail systems this year and next will boost revenue growth for most rated Chinese construction companies, with China Railway Group Limited (CRG, A3 stable), China Railway Construction Corporation Limited (CRCC, A3 stable) and China Communications Construction Co. Ltd. (CCCC, A3 stable) set to benefit the most. "We expect CRG, CRCC and CCCC to benefit most from the increase in infrastructure investment, as more than 50% of their revenue comes from infrastructure construction, and the other half from construction and other segments," says Chenyi Lu, a Moody's Vice President and Senior Credit Officer.

  • UBS Can Ride Out the 'Pig' Controversy

    UBS Can Ride Out the 'Pig' Controversy

    (Bloomberg Opinion) -- Expect “Pig-gate” to blow over. UBS Group AG’s ultra-rich Chinese clients are unlikely to desert the Swiss bank for local rivals, whatever the level of outrage over language used by its chief economist in a research report last week.The bank's potential loss of Chinese share-sale mandates isn’t a critical blow: UBS ranks a distant 11th in underwriting Hong Kong IPOs in 2019. (The bank fell behind after a one-year ban by the Securities and Futures Commission over deficiencies in its work on three companies that ran into trouble after listing.) Nor is the loss of bond mandates, such as its exclusion from a sale by state-owned China Railway Construction Corp.Wealth management is different. UBS is vying for a share of a Chinese private-banking market that was worth a record $24 trillion in 2018, according to Boston Consulting Group. The furor among local brokerages over UBS’s use of “Chinese pig” in a report on pork supply and inflation comes just as the Swiss firm and other foreign banks are muscling in on their turf. Switzerland’s Credit Suisse Group AG, Japan’s Nomura Holdings Inc., and Wall Street giants JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Morgan Stanley are among firms that have received approval to expand or are working toward taking majority stakes in China ventures.On top of that, Chinese regulators have cracked down on high-risk wealth management products sold by local banks and brokerage firms. That’s leveled the playing field for overseas competitors, which say their stricter compliance guidelines wouldn’t allow them to offer such investments.Still, it’s outside China where UBS has most to protect. Like all foreign banks, it’s a minnow in the mainland market. By contrast, there’s a treasure trove of Chinese money being managed offshore in cities such as Hong Kong, Singapore and New York, according to a survey by consulting firm Capgemini SE last year. Boston Consulting reckons that market is worth $1 trillion. And here, UBS is hard to beat.At the end of last year, the Zurich-based bank had $152 billion more in assets under management in Asia outside mainland China than Credit Suisse, its nearest rival. Chinese players don’t rank in the top 10 for bankers to well-heeled individuals in the region, according to data from Asian Private Banker.UBS took in an unprecedented $16 billion in net new money in the first quarter, driving its Asia-Pacific assets to $405 billion. Credit Suisse collected the equivalent of $4.4 billion. UBS was also the region’s top equities trading house in the region last year, ahead of Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan, according to data from London-based analytics firm Coalition Development Ltd. It’s been Asia’s No. 1 equities house since 2010. That’s key for high-net-worth individuals looking for ideas to trade on.Money tends to flow to where it earns the most, other things being equal. Also, many clients have bought derivatives from UBS, which can’t be unwound at short notice without heavy penalties. UBS can console itself with the thought that other foreign banks have been able to ride out similar difficulties in Asia. Time is on its side.  To contact the author of this story: Nisha Gopalan at ngopalan3@bloomberg.netTo contact the editor responsible for this story: Matthew Brooker at mbrooker1@bloomberg.netThis column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Nisha Gopalan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering deals and banking. She previously worked for the Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones as an editor and a reporter.For more articles like this, please visit us at©2019 Bloomberg L.P.

  • China Is Mad at UBS. Welcome to Emerging Markets

    China Is Mad at UBS. Welcome to Emerging Markets

    (Bloomberg Opinion) -- UBS Group AG has managed to alienate an important client that it’s hoping to milk for millions in fees.State-owned China Railway Construction Corp. has decided against hiring UBS as a joint global coordinator on a dollar-bond sale, Cathy Chan of Bloomberg News reported Monday. Haitong International Securities Group Ltd. has already cut business ties with the Swiss bank, while the Securities Association of China recommended members shun research by global chief economist Paul Donovan over language used in a research report last week.At issue were Donovan’s comments on the rise of inflation in China:“Does this matter? It matters if you are a Chinese pig. It matters if you like eating pork in China. It does not really matter to the rest of the world.”Two debates ensued. The first is whether Donovan’s words are offensive and racist. Even linguists are chiming in. The second is whether U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration is right after all: Is doing business in China more perilous for foreign firms? Will Beijing continue to protect domestic players despite its vows to open up?As a native Chinese speaker, I don’t find Donovan’s comments racist, and certainly didn’t draw a connection with the pejorative term for Chinese laborers who built U.S. railroads in the 19th century. Rather, I find his choice of words unfortunate, and perhaps insensitive, given UBS is keen on luring wealthy Chinese clients.Bear in mind that 2019 is the Year of the Pig, which is supposed to be bountiful and abundant. Yet the nation, where pork remains the main source of animal protein, is suffering from a swine fever epidemic. To make matters worse, this year is shaping up to be another painful one for the economy: Growth is losing steam, despite Beijing’s trillion-yuan stimulus package, and the stock market is now in correction zone. Donovan’s comments were inauspicious, at a time when Chinese investors are already in a foul mood. I’d be willing to bet that we Chinese would better absorb his dry humor if the nation’s economic engine was running at full steam. You could say that China’s response has been a bit heavy-handed. But tough luck. It’s called the cost of doing business in emerging markets, and China is by no means an exception. Foreign banks have gotten into just as much trouble for lesser offenses. Two examples in the recent past come to mind.Andy Xie, an MIT-trained star economist, left Morgan Stanley in 2007 after an email he wrote citing “money laundering” as one reason for Singapore’s economic success. Never mind that it was an internal message. Donovan’s published report, meanwhile, presumably went through the requisite compliance hoops. Xie had disparaged Singapore, an Asian Tiger. Or consider what happened to JPMorgan Chase & Co. in Indonesia. In 2017, the government severed business ties with the bank, eliminating its role as a primary dealer in sovereign-bond auctions. That came after its research division downgraded the nation’s stocks to underweight, citing a “spike in volatility” following Trump’s surprise election win. The response also punished investment bankers for equity research, despite the well-established split between the businesses. That penalty certainly hurt: Indonesia is a mover and shaker in the bond world, with close to 40% of its sovereign issues taken up by foreigners.For UBS, even bigger asset-management fees are at stake. Unlike in the U.S., where passive funds now dominate, China is the last big market on earth where investors still have faith in active managers. That explains why global banks are falling over themselves to bulk up there.When I wrote about this in April, I warned that domestic brokers wouldn’t leave the field to the foreign “barbarians.” A cynic could ask about the conflict of interest apparent in Pig-Gate. After all, core members of the Chinese Securities Association of Hong Kong, which demands Donovan’s dismissal, and the Securities Association of China, which aims to block out UBS, compete with the Swiss bank for China money. In that light, the outcome with Haitong isn’t all that surprising.   At the end of the day, beggars can’t be choosers. With its investment-banking business falling behind that of U.S. mega banks and Swiss rival Credit Suisse AG, UBS needs its wealth-management business. In that case, it had better start doing more to please a moody client.To contact the author of this story: Shuli Ren at sren38@bloomberg.netTo contact the editor responsible for this story: Rachel Rosenthal at rrosenthal21@bloomberg.netThis column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Shuli Ren is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian markets. She previously wrote on markets for Barron's, following a career as an investment banker, and is a CFA charterholder.For more articles like this, please visit us at©2019 Bloomberg L.P.

  • UBS loses role in bond deal for Chinese firm on outcry over pig comment

    UBS loses role in bond deal for Chinese firm on outcry over pig comment

    UBS has lost a lead role on a U.S. dollar bond deal for state-backed China Railway Construction Corp, just days after a Chinese outcry over a senior UBS economist's use of "pig" in connection with Chinese food price inflation. While UBS apologised for the remark on Thursday and put the analyst on leave on Friday, the furore led Haitong International Securities, a leading Chinese brokerage, to suspend all business with the Swiss group as some Chinese bankers and analysts criticised the bank for a lack of cultural awareness. On Monday, a spokesman at Chinese infrastructure giant CRCC confirmed it had dropped the Swiss banking giant from the deal, but did not give a reason.

  • Moody's

    China Railway Construction Corp Ltd -- Moody's affirms CRCC's A3 rating and assigns Baa1 subordinated perpetual rating; outlook stable

    Rating Action: Moody's affirms CRCC's A3 rating and assigns Baa1 subordinated perpetual rating; outlook stable. Global Credit Research- 14 Jun 2019. Hong Kong, June 14, 2019-- Moody's Investors Service ...


    Asian Stocks Rise, Chinese Markets Surge on Government Funding Support - Asian markets rose in morning trade on Tuesday, with Chinese stocks outperforming their regional peers on reports of government funding support for major investment projects.

  • Reuters

    BRIEF-Consortium Of China Railway Construction's Unit Wins PPP Contract Worth About 4.23 Bln Yuan

    May 10 (Reuters) - China Railway Construction Corp Ltd : * SAYS UNIT'S CONSORTIUM WINS LAND DEVELOPMENT PPP CONTRACT WITH TOTAL INVESTMENT AT ABOUT 4.23 BILLION YUAN ($620.97 million) Source text in Chinese: ...

  • Moody's

    China Railway Construction Corp Ltd -- Moody's announces completion of a periodic review of ratings of China Railway Construction Corp Ltd

    Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") has completed a periodic review of the ratings of China Railway Construction Corp Ltd and other ratings that are associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted through a portfolio review in which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating profile to similarly rated peers. This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is likely in the near future.

  • Don’t Be Fooled by China’s Old Debt Playbook

    Don’t Be Fooled by China’s Old Debt Playbook

    (Bloomberg Opinion) -- Build it and they will come. Or will they?

  • Moody's

    China Railway Construction Corp Ltd -- Moody's: CRCC's rise in leverage is in line with expectations, supports rating

    Moody's Investors Service says that China Railway Construction Corp Ltd's (CRCC, A3 stable) report that it had increased leverage for the 12 months ended June 2018 is in line with Moody's expectations. The 30 August report of increased leverage also supports the company's A3 issuer and senior unsecured bond ratings, the A3 backed senior unsecured bond rating of its subsidiary CRCC Yupeng Limited, and the A3 backed senior unsecured bond rating of another subsidiary, CRCC Yuxiang Limited.