CXGH.F - Xinjiang Goldwind Science&Technology Co.,Ltd

Frankfurt - Frankfurt Delayed Price. Currency in EUR

Xinjiang Goldwind Science&Technology Co.,Ltd

No. 107 Shanghai Road
Economic & Technological Development Zone
Urumqi 830026
China
86 99 1376 7402
http://www.goldwind.com.cn/

SectorIndustrials
IndustryDiversified Industrials
Full Time Employees8,753

Key Executives

NameTitlePayExercisedYear Born
Mr. Gang WuChairmanN/AN/A1958
Mr. Zhigang CaoPres & Exec. DirectorN/AN/A1975
Mr. Chunzhi LiuChief Financial OfficerN/AN/A1968
Mr. Haibo WangExec. DirectorN/AN/A1974
Mr. Kai WuExec. VPN/AN/A1969
Amounts are as of and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay is salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in EUR.

Description

Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co., Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a wind power company in Mainland China and internationally. It operates through four segments: WTG Manufacturing, Wind Power Services, Wind Farm Investment and Development, and Others. The company engages in the manufacture and sale of wind turbine generators and wind power components; and construction and operation of wind farms. Its products include 1.5 megawatt, 2.5 megawatt, and 3.0 megawatt, as well as 2 and 6 XMW permanent magnet direct-drive wind turbine generators. The company is also involved in the manufacture of wind power equipment; water treatment solutions; and photovoltaics, including smart energy storage centers and standard PV inverters. Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co., Ltd. was founded in 1998 and is headquartered in Urumqi, China.

Corporate Governance

Xinjiang Goldwind Science&Technology Co.,Ltd’s ISS Governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder Rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while a 10 indicates higher governance risk.