|Bid||14.22 x 0|
|Ask||14.22 x 0|
|Day's Range||14.08 - 14.27|
|52 Week Range||12.92 - 16.67|
|Beta (3Y Monthly)||0.86|
|PE Ratio (TTM)||14.87|
|Earnings Date||Oct 24, 2019|
|Forward Dividend & Yield||0.82 (5.73%)|
|1y Target Est||18.06|
(Bloomberg) -- Italian Finance Minister Roberto Gualtieri dismissed the last government’s plan to sell state assets equal to about 1% of gross domestic product in 2019 as “very unrealistic.”The previous administration had pledged privatizations of about 18 billion euros ($20 billion) as part of a deal with the European Union to avoid sanctions over excessive debt. While the target always seemed optimistic, Gualtieri said the focus now will shift to making assets owned by the state more efficient.“I don’t think privatizations are a tool to generate cash, and to occasionally draw resources from just to square the budget,” he said in a press conference Saturday in Helsinki, where he attended his first meeting of European finance ministers after being appointed. “Italy has very efficient companies, large publicly owned companies which are strategic and efficient, that pay dividends to the state rather being a cost for it.”Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte’s new government has been welcomed favorably by markets after striking a distinctly more pro-European tone in comparison to the previous populist administration, which was also led by Conte.But the pressure is now on drafting a 2020 budget that avoids an automatic sales tax increase worth 23 billion euros, keeps promises of introducing a minimum wage and at the same time reducing Italy’s huge public debt.“A country like Italy should put debt on a downward trajectory,” Gualtieri said. “This must happen through several factors: support for growth, strengthening the credibility in the country, which brings a reduction of the debt cost, and public finance balance.”Gualtieri dismissed reports in the Italian media of a government plan to raise as much as 6 billion euros from asset sales this year as part of its strategy to cut the country’s debt. The plan reportedly included transferring to state lender Cassa Depositi e Prestiti SpA some of its stakes in Eni SpA, Poste SpA, STM and Enav SpA.To contact the reporter on this story: Alessandro Speciale in Rome at email@example.comTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Chad Thomas at firstname.lastname@example.org, Sara Marley, Andrew LangleyFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
Private-equity backed oil and gas firm Neptune Energy plans to be ready for an initial public offering by April next year, Chief Financial Officer Armand Lumens said on Thursday. Neptune, backed by the Carlyle Group and CVC Capital partners and headed by former Centrica boss Sam Laidlaw, in 2017 acquired oil and gas assets from French Engie for $3.9 billion, including in the North Sea.
Lebanon is preparing itself to start drilling for oil & gas in its prolific offshore oil & gas basins, but myriad of stumbling blocks prevent the country from becoming a influential player
Eni (E) reported comprehensive earnings miss, TC Energy's (TRP) bottom line matched the Zacks Consensus Estimate, while Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD) outperformed our profit projection.
The event is EnerCom's 24th annual Denver investment conference. At this year's conference, c-level leadership of leading oil and gas companies will present their plans for drilling and completing wells, discuss well results and capital efficiency, and estimate capital expenditures and production for the balance of 2019 and into 2020.
European Union foreign ministers on Monday turned up the pressure on Turkey after approving an initial batch of sanctions against the country over its drilling for gas in waters where EU member Cyprus has exclusive economic rights.
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Italian Interior Minister Matteo Salvini, leader of the nationalist-populist League party, is having a hard time waving off accusations that one of his close aides plotted to get Kremlin funding for the political force. It should be clear by now that such aid is readily available to European populist parties. If voters don’t see it as a deterrent – and so far they don’t – then it’s only going to become more brazen. The first report of a Moscow meeting between Gianluca Savoini, Salvini’s former spokesman, and some Russians with high-level government contacts appeared in the Italian magazine L’Espresso in February. At the meeting, an oil deal was supposedly discussed: The Russian state-owned oil company Rosneft would sell some Russian diesel fuel to an Italian intermediary at a discount; the intermediary would then sell it on to Italy’s Eni SpA and use the profit to fund the League.Last week, Buzzfeed published what it said was the transcript of a secret recording of that meeting. It contains some titillating details about how the proposed deal would be structured to hide the Russian involvement, the amount of fuel to be sold (250,000 tons a month for a year), the size of the discount (4%) – and a Russian demand for a kickback. Buzzfeed calculated the Italians stood to receive about $65 million so the League could “sustain a campaign.”As in February, there’s still no evidence that the deal actually took place, that the League received any Russian money or that Salvini even knew about the negotiations. An Italian lawyer, Gianluca Meranda, has since come forward claiming that he’d been present at the meeting and that the transaction hadn’t been completed. And Salvini has said that he’s “never taken a ruble, a euro, a dollar or a liter of vodka in financing from Russia.”As Samuel Greene, director of the Russia Institute at King’s College London, pointed out in a recent Twitter thread, it’s natural for Putin to offer enticements to potential allies, and he doesn’t much care about European laws (or Russian ones, for that matter). “What should be much more surprising and troubling,” Greene wrote, “is the increasing number of players in our own political establishments who are willing to sell out -- politicians and voters who no longer think our own rules matter. That's the threat.”As I’ve written before, European populists are perfectly aware of the toxicity of accepting Russian money in any form. In some countries, Italy among them, political slush funds are not unheard of – but Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election has drawn so much attention, including from intelligence services, that accepting the Kremlin’s financial aid increases the probability of getting caught. That explains Salvini’s obvious caution – and that of Brexit campaign funder Arron Banks, who apparently turned down offers of lucrative Russian deals. And yet the aftermath of the sting operation that brought down the Austrian government just before the European Parliament election in May suggests voters may increasingly be willing to shrug off such Russian involvement. Austrian Vice Chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache, then leader of the Freedom Party, the junior partner in the ruling coalition, was recorded holding talks with a woman he thought was a Russian billionaire’s niece. He discussed a plan to buy Austria’s biggest tabloid newspaper to ensure favorable coverage for his party and told her she could make an illegal donation to the party through a special foundation. Then-Chancellor Sebastian Kurz forced Strache to resign and dissolved the coalition. But the Freedom Party’s support didn’t collapse. In the European Parliament election, it won 17.2% of the vote, less than the 20.5% it garnered in the 2017 national election but still a surprisingly high percentage under the circumstances.Strache himself received the second highest number of votes among Freedom Party candidates and won one of the party’s three European Parliament seats. He refused to take it, saying he didn’t want to move to Brussels. Indeed, he only paid a political price because his coalition partner, Kurz, used the scandal to shake off an uncomfortable alliance with the far right. The Freedom Party is polling close to 19% in the run-up to the national election in October.The League’s polling numbers are on the rise despite the Russia scandal. It’s conceivable that populist voters simply don’t care about the Kremlin scare, either because they’re generally sympathetic toward Russian President Vladimir Putin (who cleverly echoes hard right rhetoric as he seeks allies in Europe) or because they write off media reports of Russia scandals as fake news. The more Russia scandals hatch and pass without consequences, the more the latter perception will be reinforced: one can’t cry wolf too many times. Voters also know these parties have a harder time gaining funding and may simply be willing to ignore such freelancing if it helps their larger anti-establishment cause. It has long been clear that legal forms of aid, such as French nationalist Marine Le Pen’s Russian bank loans, are fine with such politicians’ supporters. The Brexit Party’s voters have also brushed off concerns about Russian interference in the 2016 referendum. Ultimately, if voters keep showing they don’t mind politicians’ Kremlin links, all the politicians need to do is set up legal structures to receive Putin’s aid with a minimum of risk. That may not be straightforward, but it’s more a technical task rather than a political one.So far, the European establishment has failed to impress on a significant number of voters the idea that Putin is a threat. That’s part of its general vulnerability. Whether or not the Kremlin may becomes an agenda-setting player in European politics, the record so far suggests it will continue to look for open doors and increasingly find them. To contact the author of this story: Leonid Bershidsky at email@example.comTo contact the editor responsible for this story: Therese Raphael at firstname.lastname@example.orgThis column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Leonid Bershidsky is Bloomberg Opinion's Europe columnist. He was the founding editor of the Russian business daily Vedomosti and founded the opinion website Slon.ru.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinion©2019 Bloomberg L.P.