EPWR.V - ePower Metals Inc.

TSXV - TSXV Delayed Price. Currency in CAD

ePower Metals Inc.

1030 W Georgia Street
Suite 1507
Vancouver, BC V6E 2Y3
Canada
604-428-6128
http://www.epowermetals.com

SectorBasic Materials
IndustryIndustrial Metals & Minerals
Full Time Employees2

Key Executives

NameTitlePayExercisedYear Born
Mr. Simon J. AndersonChief Financial Officer8.16kN/A1961
Mr. J. Michael William Collins P.Geo.VP of Operations & Director86kN/A1968
Mr. Andrew William BoweringCEO & DirectorN/AN/A1961
Mr. Gregory K. LillerCOO & DirectorN/AN/A1954
Mr. Tyler RossVP of Investor RelationsN/AN/AN/A
Amounts are as of December 31, 2018 and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay is salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in CAD.

Description

ePower Metals Inc. acquires, explores for, and develops interests in mineral projects in Canada. It primarily explores for energy-related metals, such as cobalt, manganese, copper, and gold deposits. The company has 50% interests in the Panther Creek cobalt project comprising 155 lode mining claims totaling 3,040 acres and a 41.279-acre mining lease located in the Idaho cobalt belt to the northwest-southeast of east-central Idaho. It also has interests in the Brokopondo cobalt property with approximately 8,900 hectors prospecting permit located in Suriname, as well as Magenta project comprising 5 claims totaling 2,274 hectares located in Sinaloa, Mexico. The company was formerly known as Argus Metals Corp. and changed its name to ePower Metals Inc. in December 2017. ePower Metals Inc. was incorporated in 1981 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Corporate Governance

ePower Metals Inc.’s ISS Governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder Rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while a 10 indicates higher governance risk.