EQM - EQM Midstream Partners, LP

NYSE - Nasdaq Real Time Price. Currency in USD

EQM Midstream Partners, LP

2200 Energy Drive
Canonsburg, PA 15317
United States

IndustryOil & Gas Midstream
Full Time Employees

Key Executives

NameTitlePayExercisedYear Born
Mr. Thomas F. KaramChairman & CEO of EQM Midstream Services, LLC494.82kN/A1959
Ms. Diana M. CharlettaPres, COO & Director of EQM Midstream Services, LLC628.96kN/A1973
Mr. Kirk R. OliverSr. VP, CFO & Director of EQM Midstream Services, LLC164.42kN/A1958
Mr. Brian P. PietrandreaVP & Chief Accounting OfficerN/AN/AN/A
Mr. Nathan TetlowVP of Corp. Devel. & Investor RelationsN/AN/AN/A
Amounts are as of December 31, 2018 and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay is salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in USD.


EQM Midstream Partners, LP owns, operates, acquires, and develops midstream assets in the Appalachian Basin. It operates through three segments: Gathering, Transmission, and Water. As of December 31, 2018, the company owned approximately 700 miles of high-pressure gathering lines and 1,500 miles of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulated low-pressure gathering lines; approximately 950 miles of FERC regulated interstate pipelines; and approximately 160 miles of pipelines. It serves local distribution companies, marketers, producers, utilities, and other customers primarily in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio. The company was formerly known as EQT Midstream Partners, LP and changed its name to EQM Midstream Partners, LP in October 2018. EQM Midstream Partners, LP is based in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania.

Corporate Governance

EQM Midstream Partners, LP’s ISS Governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder Rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while a 10 indicates higher governance risk.