F - Ford Motor Company

NYSE - Nasdaq Real Time Price. Currency in USD
10.09
+0.04 (+0.40%)
As of 2:49PM EDT. Market open.
Stock chart is not supported by your current browser
Previous Close10.05
Open10.08
Bid10.09 x 46000
Ask10.10 x 1100
Day's Range10.05 - 10.20
52 Week Range7.41 - 12.05
Volume24,954,948
Avg. Volume39,021,918
Market Cap40.255B
Beta (3Y Monthly)0.97
PE Ratio (TTM)12.99
EPS (TTM)0.78
Earnings DateJul 24, 2019
Forward Dividend & Yield0.60 (6.30%)
Ex-Dividend Date2019-04-23
1y Target Est10.44
Trade prices are not sourced from all markets
  • 2020 Lincoln Aviator fuel economy revealed
    Autoblog5 hours ago

    2020 Lincoln Aviator fuel economy revealed

    Ford finally revealed some of the last details, such as fuel economy, for the non-hybrid 2020 Explorer. The 2020 Lincoln Aviator has just two engine options, a base turbocharged 3.0-liter V6 with 400 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque, and the same engine coupled to a hybrid system with 450 horsepower and 600 pound-feet of torque. With all-wheel drive it gets nearly the same fuel economy as the fast Ford with 17 mpg in the city, 24 on the highway and 20 in combined driving.

  • Zacks.com featured highlights include: Party City, Ford, JinkoSolar, Legg Mason and Greenbrier
    Zacks3 hours ago

    Zacks.com featured highlights include: Party City, Ford, JinkoSolar, Legg Mason and Greenbrier

    Zacks.com featured highlights include: Party City, Ford, JinkoSolar, Legg Mason and Greenbrier

  • C-Suite Rides: Mitsubishi still sells vehicles in the U.S.? Yes, but very quietly
    American City Business Journals3 hours ago

    C-Suite Rides: Mitsubishi still sells vehicles in the U.S.? Yes, but very quietly

    It’s nice to know that Mitsubishi is still making vehicles. But none of them for sale today have the panache and style like the 3000GT VR4 from yesteryear.

  • American City Business Journals4 hours ago

    Automotive Minute: 2020 Ford Explorer most desirable as a non-hybrid, mid-grade model (Photos)

    The redesigned 2020 Ford Explorer walks the line between traditional gasoline and hybrid powertrains offering buyers a bevy of options. However, not all of them satisfy, writes Eileen Falkenberg-Hull.

  • Autos Power Industrial Production Higher: 5 Picks
    Zacks6 hours ago

    Autos Power Industrial Production Higher: 5 Picks

    An increase in production of autos and related parts was the highlight of May???s report.

  • After Mario Draghi, It Could be Jerome Powell’s Turn to Go Dovish
    Market Realist6 hours ago

    After Mario Draghi, It Could be Jerome Powell’s Turn to Go Dovish

    Draghi's decision to take a dovish approach comes a day before the Fed’s policy decision. Fed Chair Jerome Powell is also expected to take a dovish stance, but a rate cut this month looks quite improbable.

  • Will the Fed Cut the Interest Rate on June 19?
    Market Realist7 hours ago

    Will the Fed Cut the Interest Rate on June 19?

    The Fed's two-day meeting is scheduled to start on June 19. The Fed will release a statement and announce its interest rate decision on the same day. Expert Jim Grant weighs in on the possibility of an interest rate cut.

  • Bloomberg11 hours ago

    Ford Takes Regulator for a Spin in Pitch to Save Connected Cars

    (Bloomberg) -- Automakers won control over a choice swath of wireless spectrum 20 years ago on the promise of delivering safety innovations to vehicles.Now, after failing to deliver widespread breakthroughs, they’re at risk of losing those frequencies to Comcast Corp. and other cable companies that say they can use them to offer robust Wi-Fi links to subscribers.The years-long struggle between the industries is nearing an inflection point, with Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai signaling he may consider new uses for the airwaves. Pai could announce as early as Tuesday that he’ll schedule a vote to re-examine the allocation at the commission’s meeting next month.“The spectrum, for 22 years, has not reached its highest valued use, and that’s part of the reason why I think it’s important to have an open conversation,” Pai said at a Senate hearing last week. “I’m not saying what the answer should be, I’m simply saying let’s ask the questions that would enable us to have an informed conversation.”That conversation has already kicked off a flurry of activity by stakeholders. A team at Ford Motor Co. gave Pai a ride in a specially outfitted F-150 pickup truck earlier this month. The idea was to demonstrate the technology that could, for example, warn of a scooter’s approach or judge when it’s safe to enter an intersection.“Grateful to Ford for showing us a glimpse of the future,” Pai said in a tweet after his parking-lot spin. “It’s important to have an open conversation about the future of this band” of airwaves.Ford and other carmakers including BMW AG and Toyota Motor Corp., don’t want to lose the rights they gained in 1999 from the FCC for a system designed to link cars, roadside beacons and traffic lights into a seamless wireless communication web to avoid collisions and heed speed limits.Yet after nearly two decades, deployments have been few. An Obama administration proposal to mandate the technology in new cars has been left to languish under the deregulatory agenda pursued by President Donald Trump. General Motors Co. introduced the first factory-equipped model, a Cadillac sedan, just two years ago. And in April, Toyota scrapped plans to equip its cars with the systems starting in 2021.Now even automakers are moving away the original system, and see greater promise in a newer method based on cellular radios -- the system in the F-150 that Ford showed off for the FCC’s Pai. Ford plans to begin equipping all of its U.S. vehicles with the systems starting in 2022.That is an issue for carmakers as the 1999 allocation of airwaves by the FCC locked them into the system envisioned then. They need new rules to use a cellular system, which is backed by several companies including Ford, Audi AG and gear maker Qualcomm Inc.Ford, in a statement, said it is “critical” for the FCC to allow the newer, cellular-based method to use the airwaves because it will become the dominant technology to connect vehicles, infrastructure and pedestrians.Cable providers have pounced, characterizing the currently mandated system as fostering “two decades of stagnation.”They’ve called for ending carmakers’ exclusive rights to the frequencies at 5.9 GHz and allocating all or most of the band to the Wi-Fi systems that carry web traffic for most cable customers.Some consumer groups agree. They include the Consumer Federation of America, the American Library Association, Public Knowledge and the Open Technology Institute at New America.“The best outcome for consumers is to move vehicle safety signaling to a different set of frequencies and allow next generation Wi-Fi to use 5.9 GHz,” Michael Calabrese, director of the Wireless Future Project at the Open Technology Institute, said in an email.Pai controls the FCC’s agenda, and his impatience ushers in a moment of promise -- and peril.“We could maintain the status quo” but “I am quite skeptical that this is a good idea,” Pai said in a speech last month to a gathering that celebrated the Wi-Fi signals used for connections in hotel lobbies, coffee shops and homes.Pai said it would take a formal rulemaking to allow greater Wi-Fi use of the swath, or to let automakers exploit the band for the cellular safety system.Skepticism has arisen within the Trump administration. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao telephoned Pai to urge the FCC not to use its June meeting to commence its consideration of the airwaves, according to one official briefed on the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity because the conversation wasn’t public.While Transportation Department officials haven’t advanced the previous administration’s proposed mandate, they want autos to hold onto the airwaves.“Preserving the spectrum for transportation safety, which can save lives, is probably more important than slightly faster Wi-Fi,” Derek Kan, the Transportation Department’s undersecretary for policy, said in an interview June 3.To contact the reporters on this story: Todd Shields in Washington at tshields3@bloomberg.net;Ryan Beene in Washington at rbeene@bloomberg.netTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Jon Morgan at jmorgan97@bloomberg.net, Elizabeth Wasserman, John HarneyFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.

  • Financial Times15 hours ago

    How does the US-China trade war hurt carmakers?

    To thrive, brands need to make themselves indispensable, suggests Elspeth Chueng, global director of the brand equity database BrandZ: “It’s not just about the product, but what consumers need in their daily lives.” As prices rise to compensate for higher tariffs — $200bn imposed by the US and $60bn by China in May — brands will need to justify that extra money. Just take US car companies in China, which are feeling the strain already. Sales in China have dropped for the first time since 1990, partly as a result of trade war uncertainty prompting consumers to hold back on purchases.

  • Why GM Is Set to Challenge Tesla in Electric & Autonomous Vehicle Markets
    Zacks20 hours ago

    Why GM Is Set to Challenge Tesla in Electric & Autonomous Vehicle Markets

    GM is one of many automakers trying to chase Tesla (TSLA) as the top electric and autonomous vehicle manufacturer, with plans to produce 20 models of electric cars by 2023.

  • Ford Rose 2.2% Last Week despite Recalling 1.2 Million SUVs
    Market Realist23 hours ago

    Ford Rose 2.2% Last Week despite Recalling 1.2 Million SUVs

    On June 12, Ford announced a recall for ~1.2 million Ford Explorers in the US and 28,000 Explorers in Canada. The defect could increase the risk of a crash by diminishing the steering control.

  • How Auto Stocks Traded in the Second Week of June
    Market Realistyesterday

    How Auto Stocks Traded in the Second Week of June

    Taking cues from the broader market movement, most auto companies traded on a slightly positive note last week. General Motors, Fiat Chrysler, and Toyota rose 0.5%, 0.5%, and 1.6%, respectively.

  • Wilbur Ross Hints at Trump’s Auto Tariffs on Europe Again
    Market Realistyesterday

    Wilbur Ross Hints at Trump’s Auto Tariffs on Europe Again

    Earlier today, US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross once again hinted at President Donald Trump’s willingness to impose auto tariffs on Europe. While talking to CNBC, Ross said that he is positive about a US-Europe trade deal.

  • Fiat Leans Toward Trump as Industry Agonizes Over Fuel Rules
    Bloombergyesterday

    Fiat Leans Toward Trump as Industry Agonizes Over Fuel Rules

    (Bloomberg) -- When a group of 17 of the world’s largest automakers sent a letter to President Donald Trump on June 6 asking him to compromise with California on vehicle-emission standards, one company was notably absent from the list of signatories: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV.That holdout stance is not atypical for the automaker, known for its Jeep SUVs, beefy pickup trucks and Italian sports cars. Most automakers have called for tapping the brakes by making adjustments to national fuel-economy and emissions standards in light of low gasoline prices and soaring SUV sales. But Fiat Chrysler’s public comments hew closer to the Trump administration’s reverse shift on Obama-era regulations.“They are looking out for their own best interest, as every company and every person does at the end of the day,” said Brett Smith, director of propulsion technology and energy infrastructure at the nonprofit Center for Automotive Research.General Motors Co. suggested a national mandate for electric vehicles in 2021 in its written comments to regulators. Honda Motor Co. called for “strong 2025 targets” and said it did not support a Trump administration proposal to freeze the standards. Ford Motor Co.’s top executives said publicly they “support increasing clean-car standards through 2025 and are not asking for a rollback.”In its written comments submitted to regulators last year, Fiat Chrysler said it agrees with one of the Trump administration’s central arguments: Stricter fuel-efficiency mandates drive up new vehicle prices, keeping older, dirtier and less-safe cars on the road longer. It said this could undermine the very air quality and safety benefits the Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rules aim to deliver.The EPA and NHTSA are preparing a final rule now that could differ from the post-2020 freeze the agencies recommended last year.“Our support for one national program and the mid-term evaluation remains unchanged,” Fiat Chrysler said in an emailed statement last week after its peers’ letter became public. “It was made clear when we were one of just two automakers to testify last September at hearings held by the EPA and NHTSA.”Shares of Fiat Chrysler rose 1.7% to $13.50 at 10:23 a.m. in New York.When the Trump administration proposed stripping California of its authority to limit tailpipe greenhouse-gas emissions last August, Fiat Chrysler made one of the industry’s strongest public endorsements of the federal government’s right to do so.“It remains our hope that conflicts over preemption will be avoided by an agreement,” the automaker wrote in comments submitted to the government last October. “However, in the absence of such an agreement, FCA agrees that the law gives the federal government the authority to preempt state standards that are directly related to fuel economy.”Fuel-Economy LaggardThe Trump administration in February terminated months of talks between federal regulators and California officials about a common standard. Automakers have urged the two sides to reach an agreement to avert a prolonged legal battle with California, but the White House has rejected that appeal. A dozen other states adhere to California’s emissions rules -- a bloc that accounts for more than a third of U.S. auto sales.Fiat Chrysler was among the first car companies to abandon sedans and, according to market research firm Edmunds, its model lineup has the lowest average fuel economy among the six biggest automakers. But almost every major manufacturer is boosting production of higher-emission SUVs and trucks for the U.S. market.The industry acted in unison urging the Obama administration to adjust fuel economy and cried foul when the EPA in 2016 determined no changes were needed, months earlier than expected. Automakers quickly appealed to a newly elected Trump early in 2017 for relief. The plea for a compromise between California and federal regulators reflects a desire to avoid costs from a split standard and the potential for years of uncertainty caused by a courtroom battle over the rules.“It’s important for them to communicate through the general public that yes, in a way, they very much do care about the environment, but they also understand they have a market to serve and to try to sell to,” Smith said.Under Chief Executive Officer Mike Manley, who took over last July, Fiat Chrysler has ramped up plans to electrify its lineup, in part to stay competitive in China and Europe where emissions standards are tougher. The automaker still stands to benefit the most from Trump’s proposed freeze, according to Alan Baum, an independent auto analyst in West Bloomfield, Michigan.“They’re way behind, by design, on electrics and hybrids,” Baum said. “To the extent there’s any improvement or required improvement in fuel economy, that’s really tough for them.”The Italian-American company has been a laggard even by industry standards. It ranked last among 13 car companies for both fuel economy and carbon emissions in the EPA’s evaluation of 2017 model-year sales. Its late CEO Sergio Marchionne publicly griped about having to sell a money-losing battery electric vehicle in California to meet that state’s more stringent emissions standards.The company has pointed out that demand for low-emissions models remains muted in much of the country, with hybrid and plug-in electric vehicles accounting for just 1.5% of U.S. vehicle sales through July of last year, according to IHS estimates. “The final rule must be based on the market realities of today,” Fiat Chrysler said in its written testimony on emissions-policy revisions.(Adds share price in 8th paragraph.)\--With assistance from Ryan Beene.To contact the reporter on this story: Gabrielle Coppola in New York at gcoppola@bloomberg.netTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Chester Dawson at cdawson54@bloomberg.net, Cécile Daurat, Kevin MillerFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.

  • Why Ford Stock Is Undervalued
    InvestorPlaceyesterday

    Why Ford Stock Is Undervalued

    Ford Motor (NYSE: F) stock has had a good run so far in 2019, closing on Friday at $9.98 and up 30% in 2019. Yet Ford stock price today could be so much higher.Source: Shutterstock The ongoing trade conflict between the U.S. and China is heightening uncertainties for the automotive market. Any punitive tariffs levied by the U.S. against China will set back Ford's turnaround.Moreover, Ford's unnecessary spending has dragged down Ford's profits and Ford stock price today. To raise F stock, Ford must cut its costs around the world. Though Ford's near-term results will lag as it restructures, value investors should keep an eye on F stock.InvestorPlace - Stock Market News, Stock Advice & Trading Tips * 7 Top-Rated Biotech Stocks to Invest In Today Restructuring OperationsF is restructuring its business at its Bridgend engine plant because of its excess engine inventories. F is also working on raising its EBIT margin to 6%. As a result, Ford may no longer obtain zero or negative profit from selling its vehicles. In Europe, expect F to concentrate on selling commercial vehicles, since that is one of its key strengths in the region.Ford is making progress in other areas. For example, it has reduced its capital expenditures more quickly than it had expected. Product MixFord will heavily promote its Ranger pickup truck in Europe, as it has already had some success selling the vehicle there. The Kuga, which is a compact SUV, continues to be popular on the continent.Since many Europeans like compact vehicles, the company's Puma, a sub-compact SUV which will be launched soon, should resonate with European consumers. As far as cars, the company's Focus and Fiesta models are still generating strong sales.Given that Explorer and Escape are the two highest selling SUVs for the company, it will develop electric, hybrid, and plug-in hybrid-power versions of those two models soon. A plug-in hybrid version of the Lincoln Aviator will also be offered in the near-term. Whether that version of the Aviator will do well remains to be seen. At a base price of $50,000, the premium vehicle could compete with similar vehicles that will be sold by BMW and Mercedes-Benz. Ford's $11 Billion Investment in Electric VehiclesFord committed to spending $11 billion over the next few years to develop electric vehicles. Ford has an electric SUV on the way, and it's slated to launch a Mustang-inspired SUV next year. F is also developing an electric F150 pickup truck that could resonate with construction workers.Instead of having a battery generator on-site, construction workers could use their electric F150s to power their tools. In the next few years, Ford will benefit from increased sales of its hybrid vehicles and its introduction of electric vehicles.Ford's upcoming EV launches in no way slow its commitment to hybrid offerings, which resonate well with its customers.To manage its EVs properly, F must align its EV launches with demand. F should not rush an incomplete EV product to market.As more charging stations come online, demand for EVs may improve, boosting demand for Evs, including those of FordDespite partnering with Volkswagen (OTC:VWAGY), Ford is still developing its own EV solution. But the two companies are collaborating on autonomous-car development. Valuation and the Bottom Line on Ford Stock Price TodayF is the second-largest producer of hybrid automobiles, but it is pivoting towards total electrification and autonomous driving. Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has already proven that there is demand for EVs. Now it is time for Ford to roll out its electric vehicles in order to accelerate the company's growth. Using a 5-year DCF Revenue Exit model (per finbox.io), and assuming that Ford's top line rises by at least 2% annually, Ford stock price today should be around $12.As of this writing, the author owns shares of Ford stock. More From InvestorPlace * 4 Top American Penny Pot Stocks (Buy Before June 21) * The 7 Best Tech Stocks to Buy for the Second Half of 2019 * 7 Top-Rated Biotech Stocks to Invest In Today * 4 Semiconductor Stocks to Sell Compare Brokers The post Why Ford Stock Is Undervalued appeared first on InvestorPlace.

  • Choose These 6 Price-to-Book Value Stocks for Higher Returns
    Zacksyesterday

    Choose These 6 Price-to-Book Value Stocks for Higher Returns

    P/B ratio is emerging as a convenient tool for identifying low-priced stocks that have high growth prospects.

  • Where Will Tesla Be in 1 Year?
    Motley Fool2 days ago

    Where Will Tesla Be in 1 Year?

    The top electric-car maker's CEO has some lofty dreams.

  • Motley Fool2 days ago

    Why The Fiat-Renault Merger Stalled

    Both companies seemed eager to join forces, and then the situation became much more complicated.

  • Ford (F) Dips More Than Broader Markets: What You Should Know
    Zacks4 days ago

    Ford (F) Dips More Than Broader Markets: What You Should Know

    Ford (F) closed at $9.98 in the latest trading session, marking a -0.8% move from the prior day.

  • Ford stock ‘underappreciated’ by Wall Street: Goldman Sachs
    MarketWatch4 days ago

    Ford stock ‘underappreciated’ by Wall Street: Goldman Sachs

    Ford Motor Co. shares may soon reap the benefits of the car maker’s restructuring in Europe, an effort that has been so far “underappreciated” by markets. Ford (F)  shares fell nearly 1% Friday, poised to end the week with 2% gains. Ford’s operating margins in Europe could improve on average about 4%, and this level of earnings “is well above Street expectations for the region over the long-term — which continue to call for losses through 2021,” the Goldman analysts, led by David Tamberrino, said.

  • Why Tesla stock can still hit $500
    Yahoo Finance4 days ago

    Why Tesla stock can still hit $500

    Here's one Tesla bull who is still feasting on the company.

  • Zacks Value Trader Highlights: AIG, Ethan Allen, Ford, Greenbrier and Zumiez
    Zacks4 days ago

    Zacks Value Trader Highlights: AIG, Ethan Allen, Ford, Greenbrier and Zumiez

    Zacks Value Trader Highlights: AIG, Ethan Allen, Ford, Greenbrier and Zumiez

  • Zacks.com featured highlights include: Legg Mason, Ford, Newmark and Sanmina
    Zacks4 days ago

    Zacks.com featured highlights include: Legg Mason, Ford, Newmark and Sanmina

    Zacks.com featured highlights include: Legg Mason, Ford, Newmark and Sanmina