GOGR - Go Green Global Technologies Corp.

Other OTC - Other OTC Delayed Price. Currency in USD

Go Green Global Technologies Corp.

580 Pepper Street
Monroe, CT 06468
United States
855-857-8158
https://www.gogreentechcorp.com

Sector(s)Industrials
IndustryPollution & Treatment Controls
Full Time Employees

Key Executives

NameTitlePayExercisedYear Born
Mr. Mark A. Del PrioreInterim ChairmanN/AN/A1978
Mr. Danny G. BishopCEO & DirectorN/AN/AN/A
Mr. John Eric D'AlessandroCo-Founder & DirectorN/AN/AN/A
Mr. Massimo DeCarliCo-Founder, Chief Technology Officer and DirectorN/AN/AN/A
Ms. Corrine CouchChief Operating OfficerN/AN/AN/A
Amounts are as of and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay is salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in USD.

Description

Go Green Global Technologies Corp. operates as a water and fuel technology licensing, marketing, manufacturing, and development company worldwide. The company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Go Green Technologies Corp., provides solutions utilizing the proprietary patented Sonical technology for non-chemical water treatment and fuel combustion applications. It offers Sonical Water Treatment System for food, coffee, home and restaurant, pharma, and other industries, including paper, textile, electronics, petrochemical, plastics molding, glass trade, and tanneries; and Sonical Fuel Charger, an electro-physical device, which is installed in the fuel supply circuit feeding motors, burners, and boilers that are used in cars, trucks, boats, and boilers. The company was founded in 2009 and is based in Monroe, Connecticut.

Corporate Governance

Go Green Global Technologies Corp.’s ISS Governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder Rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while a 10 indicates higher governance risk.