Yahoo Finance will soon be upgrading our Conversations message board platform to provide a better experience for our users. Only comments published since April 21, 2021 will be visible on Yahoo Finance after the upgrade. If you wish to download and save any of your older comments, please submit a request via the Privacy Dashboard by no later than Aug. 15, 2022.
Apparently HASI is working on a comprehensive response….that’s not really news, everyone knows that’s coming but just repeating what I read.
https://www.bakersfield.com/ap/news/bragar-eagel-squire-p-c-is-investigating-corcept-hannon-armstrong-nio-and-generac/article_1bbf83dd-25eb-5764-9626-cc48851a10c4.html
Wondering why nobody is investigating Muddy Waters...
We are short Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) because its accounting is so complex and misleading that its financial statements are effectively meaningless. HASI is a prime example of how public market incentives can warp a company into relentlessly destroying value to feed a Wall Street growth narrative. Most of HASI’s income is both non-cash and unrealizable: It has little relationship with cash to be received in the future. HASI misleadingly inflates GAAP earnings three ways: 1) Through a loophole in the arcana of accounting for renewables subsidies, HASI books non-cash unrealizable income relating to third parties’ tax credits that will be reversed; 2) HASI produces non-cash income by manipulating the discount rate it applies to residual assets to implausibly low levels, thereby inflating its gains on securitizations; and, 3) HASI books interest income from non-cash “Paid in Kind” (“PIK”) interest payments, which are essentially IOUs from stressed borrowers. "
Going on CNBC and accusing a REIT (or any corporation for that matter) of complex accounting is... well, it is like accusing pope of being Catholic. You are relying on making folks aware that they really have no idea of how a large company is run and how its financials are managed to scare them. We can do that with any company.
As for HASI's response? It was entirely on-brand and was actually far more detailed than I expected. I would have honestly expected them to stop at: 'we won't engage in tit-for-tat.' When this came out Eckel probably just rolled his eyes and said 'I have way more important things to do than deal with this.'
HASI has been around profitably for many years. The management running this company have been specialized in this industry and are extremely knowledgeable. There is so much legitimate opportunity available, there really is no reason to act fraudulently. It is exact this that Muddy Waters is accusing them of.
I will maintain faith in HASI but be keeping a keen eye on their response to these accusations