U.S. Markets closed

(LXK)


. Currency in USD
Add to watchlist
People also watch
JBLLLTCMDPKLACMAS
Full screen
Previous CloseN/A
OpenN/A
BidN/A x N/A
AskN/A x N/A
Day's RangeN/A - N/A
52 Week Rangeundefined - undefined
VolumeN/A
Avg. VolumeN/A
Market CapN/A
BetaN/A
PE Ratio (TTM)N/A
EPS (TTM)N/A
Earnings DateN/A
Dividend & YieldN/A (N/A)
Ex-Dividend DateN/A
1y Target EstN/A
Trade prices are not sourced from all markets
  • American City Business Journalslast month

    Apple cranks up its $1 billion lawsuit against Qualcomm

    Apple on Tuesday expanded its line of attack against its partner Qualcomm, arguing the San Diego-based chipmaker has no right to require Apple to pay to license its technology, before paying again to buy its chips. In a new court filing, Apple’s lawyers cited a U.S. Supreme Court ruling earlier this year against printer cartridge maker Lexmark, which attempted to sue third-party companies that refill used Lexmark printer cartridges. In a 7-1 ruling, the Justices said Lexmark could choose to make money by selling the cartridges, or licensing the technology, but not both: As soon as a Lexmark cartridge gets sold, the company can’t dictate how people use it.

  • Moody'slast month

    Project Leopard Holdings Inc. -- Moody's assigns B2 rating to Kofax

    Rating Action: Moody's assigns B2 rating to Kofax. Global Credit Research- 09 Jun 2017. $565 million of debt affected.

  • American City Business Journals2 months ago

    Resellers hail Supreme Court ruling that limits patent protections for innovators

    A U.S. Supreme Court ruling in a patent-rights case could have wide-reaching effects into multiple industries, including medical-device manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, auto parts and agriculture. In the case, Lexmark International of Lexington, Kentucky, accused Impression Products of Charleston, West Virginia, of infringing on patents because part of Impression’s business involves refilling and selling Lexmark’s toner cartridges.