Richie n grant when I post on this board, it is n Event/Info. CEO Mr. Blaisure knows certain info r kept 4 strategies not made 4 public. It is evident MaxD does no post much PR if all, check their PR history.
Here is the thing ..u n the nays “ THINK “ n that is not enough bases on u accusation of MaxD Executives. N grant is way 2 focused on the salaries, quite frankly is none of his business. MaxD Executives r earning their salaries by helping the Legal Team tremendously… MaxD is their direction…the attorney r there 2 present.
I’ve had stated previously, MaxD has to adapt 2 changing situation n not just limited 2 rd blocks n interferences.. There’s no lie or scheme .. It’s just how things falls ..
MaxD has it hands on many things n the set up is working out nicely ( Patents Co-Ownership). Top priority is a win from the litigation that will change the entire scope of the company.
Mr. Hawkins of VLL understand completely how lucrative it is squashing Alphabet Inc. Google as prime example n then obtaining royalties n licensing over 1,200 infringers .. Hoo hoo ^_^
MaxD then can execute the ventures with funding from the litigation win… ^_^
U may not b happy now; however, n the n result many will feel differently when that time does take into effect, n I expect n apology from all those foo …rite now MaxD will do it’s thing rather u like it or not .. MaxD is still alive n well n moving forward on the dreams 2 becoming a reality …. EU is n good hands …Smiling ^_~ WINK !
Cheers to the faithful investors!
PS. Where’s The Beef! .. Aaahh.. The Big Giant Has It .. Hoo hoo ^_^
__________ Richie 22 minutes ago @Rurouni (Greg Halpern) You're disengenious, you trying to twist my words. That was an observation not a defense of Google. If I was defending Google I would have said "google is innocent so it's obvious why they would want it sealed". My prior posts where I site the "post-it notes" proves I don't think Google is innocent but I don't think they are the only dishonest party here either. I think MAXD is dishonest and I think it is just a scheme to generate salaries for you and John. If anyone really has paid attention to this stock over the last ~3 years they can see the pattern. It's a pattern of finding something newsworthy and riding it out until the next newsworthy thing comes along just to keep the money coming in. Look at the dilution, look at the failed contracts quitely swept under the rug. I don't doubt the litigation is happening and that you have some hope for a payday but this isn't the actions of a fudiciary. (And it isn't genuine to the original promises of monitizing IP). It is the actions of a self-servicing opportunist who would rather twist words than speak truth or run a legit company. You make comments that are intentionally uncommitted and vague but that you know people (who are hoping for and expecting a positive outcome) will basically fill in the blanks and draw that conclusion. At least in press releases you include a "forward looking statement" but not on your posts.
Shareholders should wonder more about what management (their employees) are doing to earn those $500,000/yr salaries. - What plan do those employees have to enforce contracts with Nash? - What are those employees going to do to fund the company until 2020 (earliest EA lawsuit payout)? - What will those employees do to fulfill their promises of revenue generation? - Why are those employees not re-investing a single dime of their $500,000/y salaries into buying more shares at these record-low stock prices?
When shareholders get distracted by personal attacks on other shareholders, or complain about adversaries' bad behaviour, it prevents them from pushing for improvements that they CAN CONTROL. (i.e., the behaviour of MAXD management!)
All of this "there's secret behind the scenes stuff going on, and you don't deserve to question our salaries" stuff posted under an alias on chat forums is garbage. When you are paying $500,000/yr you DESERVE HONEST ANSWERS.
Obviously I am no better than anyone else on this forum. This isn't about complaining about the past. It's a question about what will you do in the future. Will you let Halpern & Blaisure get away with collecting more millions in salaries while they fail to sell, fail to succeed, and destroy your equity? Will you watch as the stock price continues to drop year-after-year while you cross your fingers hoping for a payoff in 2020? Whenever you decide it's time, you have the right to demand answers.
BTX - I assume that you would deny that you are a paid shill, but could you - just for the record? And would you be prepared to criticize the promotional strategy of hiring people to post fictively? Unethical surely?
Well, well, well the three stooges are in the keyboard attack mode for evil google... as usual, without knowledge, and it all makes me chuckle... So we have Bilbo who claims to be an attorney and completely ignores three actions in motion and continues to lie, and mislead readers... Facts, google is under assault on three legal fronts... all due to a dishonest corporate culture beginning at the top... these legal actions against evil google are embedded culturally in the way they treat independent contractors and small businesses regarding the theift of their IP... Bilbo ignores these facts and tries to minimize their actions... Also continues to raise inaccurate claims that have been disproven... And does so repeatably...
Grantie is just a google stooge who attacks all fronts... including Nash, company management for salaries, not owning codec etc... The two named are most likely more then one person (maybe a dept) and not innocent individual board monitors just claiming to protect investors or potential investors... Poppy-clock...
Now we speak of Richie... the third member of the triumverent... Here is a person that claims to have invested 100k and lost
The 10q is out, with little fanfare. Well worth a read, especially if you are someone (like Ican) who maintains debt conversion is only a possibility.
Small debt converted to 398 million or so shares in the quarter? See also new convertible notes issued during quarter and subsequently that for whatever reason were thought not to merit a press release -- à la the '2 million dollar' financing.
Bleak picture here.
Now this is hilarious...BTX comments on James Damore who appeared on Fox news and as a conclusion says Google is evil. The funny part is James describes the Google response as "unable to make a point by point rebuttal" and that they "resorted to calling him names and shaming him". Sounds a lot like BTX and his team. Since in that same post BTX called Google evil I guess it's safe to say "BTX (and his shaming team) is the evil...".
James Damore, who was fired for a controversial memo he wrote about Google's diversity policies, tells Tucker the real reason he believes he was dismissed #Tucker
GM Rurouni -
Any updates with regard to revenue generation? I would question the companies ability to stay afloat, without further dilution, through what will be undoubtedly be a long drawn out legal proceeding.
Aug 14 2017 07:04am
Enjoy newbies n faithful, u heard it here 1st -
FCCOA Appeal Pre Filings -
“ Where a claim lists elements separately, "the clear implication of the claim language" is that those elements are "distinct components" of the patented invention. __________________
Plus there is 1 more details that VLL/MaxD has 2 b very careful on b4 presenting the info 2 the judges panel….exciting times coming ahead !
2 IPR/Petitions under 1 order Decision is flawed ..all will c … ^_^
Belfor, Thyagarajan, n Golin.
Spriggs n Golin
Cheers to the faithful investors!
PS. Stand By Me … Oh Yeah Oh Yeah .. ^_^
Mobile Network - Post 4 Rurouni …
Just noting that, in a discussion about the mess that is MaxDs relation to the Nash/Vedanti entities, and the VLL appeal, along comes Ican to distract us with news that the EA-MaxD agreement is filed. (He's wrong too, since it has been modified).
Stand operating procedure for this shill.
GA Rurouni and Board... Regarding the flawed IPR decision... it is clear that several errors were made by the judges panel... they ignored the invention by giving credit or weight to Spriggs/Golin that was not present... As I recall, they ignored the dynamic process from region to region and the unique pixel selection process that allowed color selection other then black, white or grey scale created by Lockheed for digital scan... They ignored the data that moved dynamically region to region and the partition that almost appears in real-time whereas Spriggs is completely static... More on this later as I am reviewing past notes... One thing to remember that before high speed internet this was irrelevant which is the reason no doubt that google went to Nash for this ability... the Nash/Krisinsky algorithm or codec performed a task never before accomplished or probably needed before high speed internet...
Maybe some intelligent comments and no bed-wetting from Dickie-boy...
Bob, Constance, Nash, Newall, Robert, Artese et al, I am somewhat surprised you have not taken the opportunity to enlighten me and anyone else who in interested, as to what you actually sold to MAXD and TG04. So be it, however as a result of my previous post I received a PM from someone calling themselves Tab Turner who claims to have a copy of the contract between you and TG04 and that the contract clearly states that you sold the codec to TG04. I have requested a copy of the contract and will post the relevant details on receipt. Whilst I am waiting for a reply, perhaps you can explain why someone would make this claim when you have clearly stated that you did not sell the codec? And perhaps also at the same time explain what you actually did sell in exchange for the $2m you received from TG04 and MAXD?
Aug 17 2017 07:09am
Newbies n faithful, just read our postings n compare who is on what sides -
There have been many good info out there on EA MaxD/VLL. As stated the PPS will rise after MaxD gets hard # n a win from the litigation.
Everyone knows by now MaxD is very focused on winning the litigation. The financials was out last week, so is a waiting game at the moment while EA MaxD/VLL do their thing behind the scene .. That should answer some of Legalhawk concerns with the finaincials…. ^_^
Relax …u never know when MaxD decides 2 pulls a miracle 4 the faithful ..hoo hoo ^_^
There r “hard evidence” that cannot b leaked just yet. VLL will put it together with the FCCOA Appeal n with .. “…..” , then perhaps that would b a good time that give faithful more confidences. .. Because Alphabet Inc. Google is currently working on the application “….” in which VLL/MaxD r currently has . “….” …. n Co-Ownership has been tackled n put 2 rest … Smiling ^_^
Also, Richie Y do u lie on defending Alphabet Inc. Google …?
“ Richie 10 days ago Naturally Google would want it sealed (innocent or not). Even an accused innocent party stands to be harmed by the proceedings. “
No matter how u word it, the statement above from u reflect a complete defense on n unethical behavior company Alphabet Inc. Google.
Richie recent post turns into a 180 degree n it has become more negative on his own 100K investment. He hasn’t lost his 100K until he sells MaxD shares n the PPS can turn around n instant with positive major Event.
Cheers to the faithful investors!
PS. U Don’t Say .. I pity the foo .. O_o __________ Richie 8 hours ago @BTX you're wrong again. I've never said anything in defense of google.
The fairytale of BAM is totally untrue., But the S.E.C. knows it. And you all know it. We had our stock stolen, sold, and then Max Sound takes write downs of $6M+ last quarter filing. The whole thing is so sick and stupid, that we can't be bothered with the bull. Google knows we own the Codec and Source Code. Netflix knows it to. And Tab Turner never ever gave the part 4 of the 4 part Sellers Disclosure and contract terms showing that Nash has always owned -when signed then -and paid a deposit while we're funding $114M in a JV-like partnership -they now disavow -but it won't help them.
The story is full of make believe. Why? I guess to avoid the S.E.C. but they already had a case and number against the Max Sound, and investor scam folks. This is easy to see the facts. Regardless of Soviet style disinformation, the S.E.C, and FBI are too smart for the twisted stories from the fertile mind of Greg Halpern, as well as the chap called Rurouni.
Constance Nash, Top Female Exec
Board... I can continue more but kicking-back enjoying an adult beverage... Oh... more on the evil google and the google actors... this game is really, really, heating up... Google goes down on this for sure... Unless they make our government their partner... the government will undoubtably reel the evil empire in... because the evil tech empire(s) are under bigger scrutiny every day... All big tech will have to join in... Amazon, Apple, MS, etc...
For the Board... Richie is a fraud... He can not answer a simple question... what did he read in the Max Sound business plan that prompted him to make the 100k investment he claimed to have made... Nobody makes that kind of investment on a pink.sheet stock unless stupid...!!!!! He and the other guys that always pop up after a BTX post should be highly questioned..! Richie says 100K invested by him.... Unless he has big mommy or daddy money he invested without an investment advisor or other knowledge.... Wow what a dope..!
Good that VLL has filed an argument. But can we hear more about this contract between VSL/Nash and TGO4.
I agree with Grant that the fillings don't clear up what MaxD owns.
GM Rurouni and Board... Isn't google challenging motion to amend so don't they have to file brief in response..?
Bob, Constance, Nash, Newall, Robert, Artese et al, I am confused, as I suspect are a number of others are who read your posts as to who owns what and who received what in exchange for money you received. You previously posted that you received in excess of $1m from an entity called TG04 however you now are stating that they do not own anything, so are you saying you duped them just like it is alleged you duped MAXD? Any chance of a concise explanation and posting a copy of the contract between you and TG04 to back up your claims?
MAXD = non practicing entity
Aug 13 2017 10:17pm
Rurouni recommend u keep those private from the board if u get it from Mr. Turner. U don’t need other Bad Eyes glamour over it. Anything piece u post will b twisted by those fools…. O_o
Even now, I won’t post certain contracts/info that is not in the Sec Filings. Well back then I did post some Arbitration n info filings prior 2 b filed with the court during the fiasco days, …those days r gone … EA MaxD/VLL is n a new Era of execution… everyone is a team n ready 2 punish Alphabet Inc. Google … hoo hoo ^_^
Ms. Nash is just Ms. Nash …everyone knows her rants by now….
Shareholders can read the PR n Sec Filings n figure 4 themselves. The reason I state this is because their r bad folks against EA MaxD/VLL …n want newbies n long time shareholders 2 fear their investments … N with good news, they twist it n some ways n sort which I find it quite amusing….those fools … ^_^
things r going 2 change after some ..”……” litigation…. Just my 2 cents … smiling ^_^
Cheers to the faithful investors!
PS. U Don’t Say .. Oh Yeah Oh Yeah .. ^_^ ________ Bentayga 4 hours ago Bob, Constance, Nash, Newall, Robert, Artese et al, I am somewhat surprised you have not taken the opportunity to enlighten me and anyone else who in interested, as to what you actually sold to MAXD and TG04. So be it, however as a result of my previous post I received a PM from someone calling themselves Tab Turner who claims to have a copy of the contract between you and TG04 and that the contract clearly states that you sold the codec to TG04. I have requested a copy of the contract and will post the relevant details on receipt. Whilst I am waiting for a reply, perhaps you can explain why someone would make this claim when you have clearly stated that you did not sell the codec? And perhaps also at the same time explain what you actually did sell in exchange for the $2m you received from TG04 and MAXD?